Examinando el papel de los «wedge issues» en la configuración del comportamiento electoral
El caso de las elecciones presidenciales de 2020 en EE. UU.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14422/cir.i27.y2023.006Palabras clave:
Elecciones presidenciales, COVID-19, temas raciales, prestigio de las instituciones políticas, discurso electoralResumen
Cada elección presidencial está marcada por temas específicos que resultan determinantes para el resultado electoral. Los llamados wedge issues, temas construidos intencionadamente para dividir a los votantes del adversario, pueden influenciar al electorado hasta el punto de movilizarlo hacia un partido u otro. Las elecciones presidenciales estadounidenses de 2020 se caracterizaron por la pandemia de la COVID-19, la crisis económica resultante de la pandemia, las acusaciones de fraude electoral y los altos niveles de desinformación, así como la brutalidad policial contra las minorías raciales, dejando un país muy dividido y a un electorado decepcionado con las instituciones políticas. El objetivo general de esta investigación es explicar el efecto del discurso político en la movilización de los votantes, principalmente el impacto que juegan los wedge issues, centrándonos en tres temas específicos de la campaña: la brutalidad contra las minorías raciales, el prestigio de las instituciones políticas y la COVID-19.
Descargas
Citas
BBC News. (2020). US election 2020: What are Trump’s and Biden’s policies? https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-54507550
BBC News. (2020a). Coronavirus: US protests against and for lockdown restrictions. https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-52344540
BBC News. (2020b). Ruth Bader Ginsburg death: Trump to nominate woman to fill Supreme Court seat. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-54216710
BBC News. (2020c). Black Lives Matter: cómo tres mujeres crearon un movimiento mundial a partir de una etiqueta de redes sociales. BBC News Mundo. https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-55124765
BBC News. (2021). Asalto al Capitolio: las pistas sobre cómo el ataque no fue tan espontáneo (y las sospechas de que hubo ayuda desde dentro). BBC News Mundo. https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-internacional-55671725
Budge, I. (2015). Issue Emphases, Saliency Theory and Issue Ownership: A Historical and Conceptual Analysis. West European Politics, 38(4), 761-777. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1039374
Budiman, A. (2020). Key facts about Black eligible voters in 2020 battleground states. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/10/21/key-facts-about-black-eligible-voters-in-2020-battleground-states/
Campbell, J. E. (2016). Appendix A Partisanship in the American Electorate. In J. E. Campbell (ed.), The American Campaign: U.S. Presidential Campaigns and the National Vote (p. 336). Texas A&M University Press.
Cilluffo, A., & Fry, R. (2020). An early look at the 2020 electorate. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2019/01/30/an-early-look-at-the-2020-electorate-2/
CNN. (2021). National Results 2020 President exit polls. https://edition.cnn.com/election/2020/exit-polls/president/national-results/6
Deane, C., & Gramlich, J. (2020). 2020 election reveals two broad voting coalitions fundamentally at odds. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/11/06/2020-election-reveals-two-broad-voting-coalitions-fundamentally-at-odds/
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1995). Attitude Strength, Attitude Structure, and Resistance to Change. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (eds.), Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences. Erlbaum.
Gerhart, A. (2020). Trump’s challenges to election results: What they are and what could happen. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/interactive/2020/election-integrity/
Gilberstadt, H., Hartig, H., Jones, B., Dunn, A., Doherty, C., Kiley, J., Daniller, A., Van Green, T., & Gomez. V. (2020). Voters’ attitudes about race and gender are even more divided than in 2016. Pew Research Center. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1426133/voters-attitudes-about-race-and-gender-are-even-more-divided-than-in-2016/2040515/
Gramlich, J. (2020). What the 2020 electorate looks like by party, race and ethnicity, age, education and religion. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/10/26/what-the-2020-electorate-looks-like-by-party-race-and-ethnicity-age-education-and-religion/
Hill, E., Tiefenthäler, A., Triebert, C., Jordan, D., Willis, H., & Stein, R. (2021). How George Floyd Was Killed in Police Custody. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/31/us/george-floyd-investigation.html
Hernandez, S., Manley, B., O’Key, S., & Pettersson, H. (2020). Tracking Covid-19 cases in the US. CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2020/health/coronavirus-us-maps-and-cases/
Hobolt, S. B., De Vries, C. E., & van de Wardt, M. (2014). Exploiting the Cracks: Wedge Issues in Multiparty Competition. The Journal of Politics, 76(4), 986-999. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381614000565
King, L. (2021). Friday’s attack is the latest violence at the US Capitol, the site of shootings, bombings and riots over the last 50 years. USA Today. https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/04/02/us-capitol-attack-latest-incident-violence-capitol-building/7068556002/
Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate: the essential guide for progressives. Chelsea Green Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520928077
Lakoff, R. (2000). The language war. University of California Press.
Mitchell, A., Jurkowitz, M., Baxter Oliphant, J., & Shearer, E. (2020). Majorities of Americans Say News Coverage of George Floyd Protests Has Been Good, Trump’s Public Message Wrong. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2020/06/12/majorities-of-americans-say-news-coverage-of-george-floyd-protests-has-been-good-trumps-public-message-wrong/
O’Keefe, D. J. (2002). Persuasion: Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.
Oppel, R. A., Taylor, D. B., & Bogel-Burroughs, N. (2021). What to Know About Breonna Taylor’s Death. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/article/breonna-taylor-police.html
Peterson, M., & Fayyad, A. (2017). The Irresistible Effectiveness of Wedge Politics: Using divisive issues to win elections might create incremental but meaningful change. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/membership/archive/2017/12/the-irresistible-effectiveness-of-wedge-politics/547946/
Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study. American Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 825-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111797
Pew Research. (2016). Top voting issues in 2016 election. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2016/07/07/4-top-voting-issues-in-2016-election/
Pew Research. (2020). Important issues in the 2020 election. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2020/08/13/important-issues-in-the-2020-election/
Pew Research. (2021). Economy and COVID-19 Top the Public’s Policy Agenda for 2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2021/01/28/economy-and-covid-19-top-the-publics-policy-agenda-for-2021/
Pew Research. (2021a). Strengthening the economy and dealing with coronavirus stand out as the public’s top priorities. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2021/01/28/economy-and-covid-19-top-the-publics-policy-agenda-for-2021/pp_2021-01-28_policy-priorities_00-01/
Sardarizadeh, S., & Lussenhop, J. (2021). Asalto al Capitolio: Los 65 días que desembocaron en el caos en Washington. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-internacional-55613105
Schaul, K., Rabinowitz, K., & Mellnik, T. (2020). 2020 turnout is the highest in over a century. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/elections/voter-turnout/
Shepherd, K. (2020). Tensions over restrictions spark violence and defiance among protesters as Trump pushes states to reopen. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/05/13/protest-violence-coronavirus/
Shields, T. G., & Hillygus, D. (2008). Candidate Strategy in the 2004 Campaign. In T. G. Shields, & D. S. Hillygus (eds.), The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns (pp. 145-182). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831593-009
Stokes, S. C. (1999). Political Parties and Democracy. Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 243-67. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.243
Urra, S. (2021, January 7). An assault against US democracy. El País. https://english.elpais.com/spanish_news/2021-01-07/an-assault-against-us-democracy.html
U.S. Census Bureau. (2021). Record High Turnout in 2020 General Election. https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2021/04/record-high-turnout-in-2020-general-election.html
Weaver, D. (1991). Issue Salience and Public Opinion: Are there consequences of Agenda-Setting? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 3(1), 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/3.1.53
Wiant, F. M. (2002). Exploiting Factional Discourse: Wedge Issues in Contemporary American Political Campaigns. Southern Communication Journal, 67(3), 276-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417940209373236
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Carmen Ramos Martínez
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los autores de artículos aceptados en Comillas Journal of International Relations conservan los derechos de propiedad intelectual sobre sus trabajos y otorgan a la revista los permisos de distribución y comunicación pública de los mismos, consintiendo que se publiquen bajo una licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional. Se recomienda a los autores publicar su trabajo en Internet (por ejemplo en páginas institucionales o personales, repositorios, etc.) respetando las condiciones de esta licencia y citando debidamente la fuente original.