Neuroenhancement: From the Scientific and Technological Avant-Garde to the Difficulties and Limits Posed by the Philosophy of the Mind and Bioethics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14422/rib.i16.y2021.003Keywords:
neuroethics, transhumanism, philosophy of the mind, neuroscienceAbstract
The biomedical applications of neuroscience are divided into those that use evaluative techniques and those that use interventional methods. Given the bio-psycho-social reach of these technologies, a philosophical and bioethical debate seems inevitable. Thus, from the philosophy of the mind, two main areas of reflection appear: conceptual problems on reading, control and mental transference, and the ontological difficulties related to the identity of the "Homo cyborg". Conversely, applied bioethics has been interested in two fundamental issues: the difference between treatment and neuronal enhancement, and the application of classical bioethical principles to neuroenhancement. Thus, applied neuroethics is proposed as a normative area from which to evaluate the use of neurotechnology.
Downloads
References
Álvarez-Díaz, J. A. (2013). Neuroética como neurociencia de la ética. Revista de Neurología, 57(08), 374. https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.5708.2013246
Álvaro-González, L. C. (2014). Neuroética (I): circuitos morales en el cerebro normal. Revista de Neurología, 58(5), 225-233. https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.5805.2013095
Aum, D. J., & Tierney, T. S. (2018). Deep brain stimulation: foundations and future trends. Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark, 23(1), 162-182. https://doi.org/10.2741/4586
Babiloni, F., Cincotti, F., Marciani, M., Salinari, S., Astolfi, L., Aloise, F., De Vico Fallani, F., & Mattia, D. (2009). On the use of brain-computer interfaces outside scientific laboratorios toward an application in domotic environments. International Review of Neurobiology, 86, 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7742(09)86010-8
Baquerizo, M., y Astucuri, J. (2012). Neurobiología de la memoria y procesos neuroquímicos implicados. Apuntes de Ciencia y Sociedad, 2(2), 160-164. https://doi.org/10.18259/acs.2012018
Bear, M. F., Connors, B. W., y Paradiso, M. A. (2008). Neurociencias: la exploración del cerebro. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Beauchamp, T. L., y Childress, J. (1999). Principios de ética biomédica. Barcelona: Masson.
Bockbrader, M. A., Francisco, G., Lee, R., Olson, J., Solinsky, R., & Boninger, M. L. (2018). Brain computer interfaces in rehabilitation medicine. PM R, 10(9), S233-S243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.05.028
Bonete, E. (2010). Neuroética práctica. Bilbao: Desclée.
Brasil-Neto, J. P., Pascual-Leone, A., Valls-Sole, J., Cohen, L. G., & Hallet, M. (1992). Focal Trascranial magnetic stimulation and response bias in a forced-choice task. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 55, 964-966. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.55.10.964
Brunet, A., Saumier, D., Liu, A., Streiner, D. L., Temblay, J., & Pitman, R. K. (2018). Reduction of PTSD symptoms with pre-reactivation propanolol therapy: a randomized controlled trial. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 175(5), 427-433. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.1705048
Casey, A., Azhar, H., Grzes, M., & Sakel, M. (2019). BCI controlled robotic arms as assistance to the rehabilitation of neurologically disabled patients. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 11, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1683239
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The Extended Mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
Cortina, A. (2011). Neuroética y neuropolítica. Sugerencias para la educación moral. Madrid: Tecnos.
Diéguez, A. (2017). Transhumanismo. La búsqueda tecnológica del mejoramiento humano. Barcelona: Herder Editorial.
Edelman, G. M., y Tononi, G. (2000). El universo de la conciencia: cómo la materia se convierte en imaginación. Barcelona: Crítica.
Elsahar, Y., Hu, S., Bouazza-Marouf, K., Kerr, D., & Mansor, Y. (2019). Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) advances: a review of configurations for individuals with a speech disability. Sensors, 19(8), 1911. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19081911
Evers, K. (2011). Neuroética. Cuando la materia se despierta. Madrid: Katz Editores.
Farah, M. J. (2005). Neuroethics: the practical and the philosophical. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 34-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.001
Farwell, L. A., Smith, S. S. (2001). Using Brain MERMER Testing to Detect Knowledge Despite Efforts to Conceal. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 46(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS14925J
Feito, L. (2015). Implicaciones de la neurociencia. Psicofármacos e identidad: entre la cultura y la biología. Pensamiento, 71(269), 1309-1321.
Feito, L. (2018). La neuroética y la posibilidad de una mejora humana. Folia Humanística, 9, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.30860/0038
Giordano, J. (2017). Progreso neurotecnológico. Necesidad de una neuroética. En El próximo paso: la vida exponencial. OpenMind BBVA. https://www.bbvaopenmind.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/BBVA-OpenMind-libro-El-proximo-paso-vida-exponencial1.pdf
Gutiérrez-Martínez, J., Cantillo-Negrete, J., Cariño-Escobar, R., Elías-Viñas, D. (2013). Los sistemas de interfaz cerebro-computadora: una herramienta para apoyar la rehabilitación de pacientes con discapacidad motora. Investigación en discapacidad, 2(2), 62-69.
Hampson, R. E., Song, D., Opris, I., Santos, L. M., Shin, D. C., Gerhardt, G. A., Marmarelis, V., Berger, T., & Deadwyler, S. (2013). Facilitation of memory encoding in primate hippocampus by a neuroprothesis that promotes task-specific neural firing. Journal of Neural Engineering, 10(6), 066013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/10/6/066013
Hanson, R. (2017). Cuando los robots gobiernen la Tierra: el legado humano. En El próximo paso: la vida exponencial. OpenMind BBVA. https://www.bbvaopenmind.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/BBVA-OpenMind-libro-El-proximo-paso-vida-exponencial1.pdf
Housley, W. J., Pitt, D., & Hafler, D. A. (2015). Biomarkers in multiple sclerosis. Clinical Immunology, 161(1), 51- 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2015.06.015
Ienca, M., & Andorno, R. (2017). Towards new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 13, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1
Jin, M. C., Medress, Z. A., Azad, T. D., Doulames, V. M., & Veeravagu, A. (2019). Stem cell therapies for acute spinal cord injury in humans: a review. Neurosurg Focus, 46(3), E10. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.12.FOCUS18602
Juengst, E. T. (1998). What does enhancement mean? En E. Parens (ed.), Enhancing Human Traits: Ethical and Social Implications (pp. 29-47). Washington DC: GUP.
Kamalian, S., & Lev, M. H. (2019). Stroke imaging. Radiologic Clinics of North America, 57(4), 717-732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2019.02.001
Kroes, M. C., Tendolkar, I., van Wingen, G. A., van Waarde, J. A., Strange, B., & Fernández, G. (2014). An electroconvulsive therapy procedure impairs reconsolidation of episodic memories in humans. Nature Neuroscience, 17(2), 204-206. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3609
Kurzweil, R. (2012). La singularidad está cerca. Cuando los humanos trascendamos la biología. Berlín: Lola Books.
Kwako, L. E., Bickel, W. K., & Goldman, D. (2018). Addiction biomarkers: dimensional approaches to understanding addiction. Trends in Molecular Medicine, 24(2), 121-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mol¬med.2017.12.007
Langleben, D. D., Schroeder, L., Maldjian, J. A., Gur, R. C., McDonald, S., Ragland, J. D., O’Brien, C. P., & Childress, A. R. (2002). Brain activity during simulated deception: an event-related functional magnetic resonance study. NeuroImage, 15(3), 727-732. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.1003
Lefaucheur, J. P. (2019). Transcranial magnetic stimulation. En Kerry H. Levin & Patrick Chauvel (eds.), Clinical Neurophysiology: Basis and Technical Aspects (pp. 559-580). Vol. 160. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64032-1.00037-0
Levy, N. (2014). Neuroética. Retos para el siglo XXI. Barcelona: Avarigani Editores.
Lin, CH., &. Wu, R. M. (2015). Biomarkers of cognitive decline in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Related Disorders, 21(5), 431-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.02.010
McColgan, P., & Tabrizi, S. J. (2019). Huntington’s disease: a clinical review. European Journal Neurology, 25(1), 24-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.13413
Moravec, H. (1988). Mind children: the future of robot and human intelligence. Cambridge University Press.
Pearce, D. (2007). The Abolitionist Proyect. https://www.hedweb.com/abolitionist-project/index.html
Perkovic, M. N., & Pivac, N. (2019). Genetic markers of Alzheimer’s disease. In Y. K. Kim (eds.), Frontiers in Psychiatry. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology (pp. 27-52). Vol. 1192. Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9721-0_3
Piedra, J. (2020). Una aproximación bioética a la mejora cognitiva en individuos sanos: “más no es mejor”. Revista latinoamericana de bioética, 19(37-2). https://doi.org/10.18359/rlbi.4292
RAE. Cíborg. https://dle.rae.es/c%C3%ADborg
Ribes, E. (2004). La psicología cognoscitiva y el conocimiento de otras mentes. Acta comportamentalia, 12, 7-21.
Ricoeur, P. (1996). Sí mismo como otro. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Rodrigues-Amorim, D., Rivera-Baltanás, T., López, M., Spuch, C., Olivares, J. M., & Agís-Balboa, R. C. (2017). Schizophrenia: a review of potential biomarkers. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 93, 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.05.009
Rodríguez, J. M. (1969). El control físico de la mente. Barcelona: Espasa-Calpe.
Rosenfeld, J. V., & Wong, Y. T. (2017). Neurobionics and the brain-computer interface: current applications and future horizons. Medical Journal of Australia, 206(8), 363-368. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja16.01011
Roskies, A. (2002). Neuroethics for the new millenium. Neuron, 35, 21-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00763-8
Rozan, V. C., Engracia, J., & Caldeira, J. H. (2014). A review of studies on neuromarketing: practical results, techniques, contributions and limitations. Journal of Management Research, 6(2), 201-220. https://doi.org/10.5296/jmr.v6i2.5446
Sandel, M. (2015). Contra la perfección. La ética en la era de la ingeniería genética. Barcelona: Marbot Ediciones.
Savulescu, J. (2012). ¿Decisiones peligrosas? Una bioética desafiante. Madrid: Tecnos.
Savulescu, J., & Persson, I. (2008). The perils of cognitive enhancement and the urgent imperative to enhance the moral character of humanity. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 25(3), 162-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5930.2008.00410.x
Sententia, W. (2004). Neuroethical considerations: cognitive liberty and converging technologies for improving human cognition. Annals of the New York Academy Sciences, 1013(1), 221-228. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1305.014
Shukla, G., Alexander, G. S., Bakas, S., Nikam, R., Talekar, K., Palmer, J. D., & Shi, W. (2017). Advanced magnetic resonance imaging in glioblastoma: a review. Chinese Clinical Oncology, 6(4), 40. https://doi.org/10.21037/cco.2017.06.28
Sugaya, K., & Vaidya, M. (2018). Stem cell therapies for neurodegenerative diseases. In K. Mettinger., P. Rameshwar & V. Kumar (eds.), Exosomes, Stem Cells and MicroRNA. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology (pp. 61-84). Vol. 1056. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74470-4_5
The hedonistic imperative. https://www.hedweb.com/hedethic/tabconhi.htm
Tirapu-Ustárruz, J., Pérez-Sayes, G., Erekatxo-Bilbao, M., Pelegrín-Valero, C. (2007). ¿Qué es la teoría de la mente? Revista de Neurología, 44(8), 479-489. https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.4408.2006295

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors of articles published in Revista Iberoamericana de Bioética retain the intellectual property rights over their works and grant the journal their distribution and public communication rights, consenting to their publication under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivates 4.0 Internacional. Authors are encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages, repositories, etc.) respecting the conditions of this license and quoting appropriately the original source.