NeuroRight to Equal Access to Mental Augmentation

Analysis from Posthumanism, Law and Bioethics

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14422/rib.i16.y2021.006

Keywords:

NeuroRights, transhumanism, posthumanism, enhancement

Abstract

This paper addresses the different discussions that led to the creation of the NeuroRights Initiative and the proposal for a NeuroRight to equal access to mental augmentation. Then it presents some conceptual clarifications, and subsequently makes a detailed analysis of the proposal in light of posthumanism. In this sense, it studies how this NeuroRight may lead to inequality, loss of social diversity and pressures on sociocultural and religious diversity. It also studies the problems and challenges inherent to the implementation of this type of initiative. We propose that a NeuroRight to enhancement should not be incorporated and that equitable access to technologies should be limited to therapeutic purposes only.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arora, L., & Narula A. (2017). Gene Editing and Crop Improvement Using CRISPR-Cas9 System. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8(1932), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01932

Borbón Rodríguez, D. A., Borbón Rodríguez, L. F., & Laverde Pinzón, J. (2020). Análisis crítico de los Neuro- Derechos Humanos al libre albedrío y al acceso equitativo a tecnologías de mejora. Ius et scientia, 6(2), 135-161. https://doi.org/10.12795/IETSCIENTIA.2020.i02.10

Bostrom, N., & Roache, R. (2007). Ethical issues in human enhancement. In J. Ryberg, T. Petersen & C. Wolf (eds.), New Waves in Applied Ethics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Bostrom, N. (2003). The transhumanist FAQ. Oxford: The world transhumanist association.

Carvalko, J. (2020). Conserving Humanity at the Dawn of Posthuman Technology. United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.

Dresler, M., Sandberg, A., Bublitz, C., Ohla, K., Trenado, C., Mroczko-Wąsowicz, A., Kühn, S., & Repantis, D. (2019). Hacking the Brain: Dimensions of Cognitive Enhancement. ACS chemical neuroscience, 10(3), 1137-1148. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00571

Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our posthuman future consequences of the biotechnology revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Garreau, J. (2005). Radical evolution: the promise and peril of enhancing our minds, our bodies and what it means to be humans. New York: Doubleday.

Hampton, R. S., & Varnum, M. E. W. (2017). Do cultures vary in self-enhancement? ERP, behavioral, and self-report evidence. Social Neuroscience, 13(5), 566-578. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2017.1361471

Ienca, M., & Andorno, R. (2017). Towards new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 13(5), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1

Kass, L. (2002). Life, Liberty and the Defense of Dignity: The Challenge for Bioethics. United States: Encounter Books

Lustig, A. (2008). Enhancement Technologies and the Person: Christian Perspectives. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 36(1), 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720x.2008.00235.x

NeuroRights Initiative. (2021). The Five NeuroRights. https://nri.ntc.columbia.edu/

Pepperell, R. (2003). The posthuman condition consciousness beyond the brain. Portland: Intellect.

Wong, J. M., Ziewacz, J. E., Ho, A. L., Panchmatia, J. R., Bader, A. M., Garton, H. J., Laws, E. R., & Gawande, A. A. (2012). Patterns in neurosurgical adverse events: intracranial neoplasm surgery. Journal of Neurosurgery Focus, 33(5), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.7.FOCUS12179

Yuste, R., Goering, S., Agüera y Arcas, B., Bi, G., Carmena, J. M., Carter, A., … & Wolpaw, J. (2017). Four ethical priorities for neurotechnologies and AI. Nature, 551(7679), 159-163. https://doi.org/10.1038/551159a

neurorights

Downloads

Published

2021-07-06

How to Cite

Borbón Rodríguez, D. A., Borbón Rodríguez, L. F. ., & León Bustamante, M. A. . (2021). NeuroRight to Equal Access to Mental Augmentation: Analysis from Posthumanism, Law and Bioethics. Revista Iberoamericana De Bioética, (16), 01–15. https://doi.org/10.14422/rib.i16.y2021.006