Exploration of Healthcare Professionals’ Stance on the Natural Moral Law

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14422/rib.i22.y2023.007

Keywords:

ethics, principlist bioethics, Natural Moral Law

Abstract

The ethical training of healthcare professionals is essential, especially in the postmodern culture, where human dignity is often neglected. According to Kant, dignity is based on autonomy as the capacity to legislate for self-determination. The secular approach to dignity allows for the establishment of normative guidelines, complemented by Natural Law. Some professionals consider that Natural Moral Law provides a solid framework for bioethics. This study investigates the prevalence of professionals adhering to Natural Moral Law and develops a scale to measure their level of agreement with it. A cross-sectional study was conducted with healthcare professionals, and a frequency analysis of 65 questionnaires was performed. The results showed that most participants took a moderate stance, not fully accepting moral relativism. Overall, participants recognized the importance of ethics in their behavior and decision-making. It was found that Natural Moral Law allows for nuances in clinical practice, guiding it towards respect for human dignity and allowing for intermediate positions towards moral relativism. The existence of moral absolutes and the desire for justice and mutual respect were confirmed. Furthermore, the importance of ethical reflection in science was emphasized to prevent human deterioration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bollen, K. y Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological bulletin, 110(2), 305. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.305

Bovero, M. (2007). Dignidad y laicidad: una defensa de la ética laica. Revista internacional de filosofía política, 30, 73-81. http://e-spacio.uned.es/fez/view/bibliuned:filopoli-2007-30-0004

Buber, M. y Ímaz, E. (1949). ¿Qué es el hombre? Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Filippi, S. (2008). La resignificación de la ley moral natural en el pensamiento medieval. Anuario filosófico, 41(91), 13-39. https://doi.org/10.15581/009.41.29237

Habermas, J. y Ratzinger, J. (2005). Los fundamentos prepolíticos del Estado democrático. Letras Libres. http://www.amoz.com.mx/Cursos%202016/RatzHaber.pdf

Kant, I. y Larroyo, F. (2007). Fundamentación de la metafísica de las costumbres. Porrúa.

Kant, I., Bennett, C., Saunders, J. y Stern, R. (2019). Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300235722

León Correa, F. J. (2009). Fundamentos y principios de bioética clínica, institucional y social. Acta bioethica, 15(1), 70-78. https://doi.org/10.4067/S1726-569X2009000100009

Lipovetsky, G. (1983). La era del vacío. Ensayos sobre el individualismo posmoderno. Anagrama.

Lorenzo Izquierdo, D. (2019). Teorías bioéticas, protección de la vida y ley natural. Cuadernos de bioética, 30(100), 263-274. https://doi.org/10.30444/CB.38

Potter, V. R. (1971). Bioethics: bridge to the future. Prentice-Hall.

Rachels, J. y Rachels, S. (2019). The Elements of Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press.

Rippel, J. A., Medeiros, C. A. d. y Maluf, F. (2016). Declaración Universal sobre Bioética y Derechos Humanos y Resolución CNS 466/12: análisis comparativo. Revista Bioética, 24, 603-612. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-80422016243160

Soberanes Fernández, J. L. (2011). 1808: Albores del constitucionalismo mexicano. Boletín mexicano de derecho comparado, 44(131), 735-782. https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24484873e.2011.131.4695

Valenzuela, J. G. (2008). Perspectivas de bioética (Vol. 2). Fondo De Cultura Económica

Decisión médica ética: equipo médico en un quirófano

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Cantú-Quintanilla, G., Farías-Yapur, A., & Aguiñaga Chiñas, N. (2023). Exploration of Healthcare Professionals’ Stance on the Natural Moral Law. Revista Iberoamericana De Bioética, (22), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.14422/rib.i22.y2023.007