The political approach of animal rights from the perspective of the rights theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14422/rib.i04.y2017.002Keywords:
animal rights, human rights, abolitionism, citizenship, social rightsAbstract
Traditionally, discussions about animal rights have focused on defending, in different ways, abolitionist or regulatory approaches. Recently, there has been a political change in the way of understanding these rights, which fits better a legal approach that considers that rights –in addition to having a moral dimension- are also effectiveness-oriented legal institutions. This leads to considering that the range of animal rights must be extended to rights linked to the condition of citizenship, such as social rights and particularly the right to healthcare and labour rights.
Downloads
References
Abramovich, V. y Courtis, C. (2002). Los derechos sociales como derechos exigibles. Madrid: Trotta.
Bentham, J. (1948). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Nueva York: Hafner.
Bobbio, N. (1991). El tiempo de los derechos. Madrid: Sistema.
Capella, F. (2016). ¿Tienen derechos los animales? Juan de Mariana. Recuperado de https://www.juandemariana.org/ijm-actualidad/analisis-diario/tienen-derechos-los-animales.
Cochrane, A. (2013). Cosmozoopolis: The Case Against Group-Differentiated Animal Rights. Law, Ethics and Philosophy, 1 127-141.
Donaldson, S. y Kymlicka, W. (2011). Zoopolis. A Political Theory of Animal Rights. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Donaldson, S. y Kymlicka, W. (2013). A defense of Animal Citizens and Sovereigns. Law, Ethics and Philosophy, 1 143-160.
Ferrajoli, L. (1999). Derechos y garantías. La ley del más débil. Madrid: Trotta.
Francione, G. L. y Garner, R. (2010). The Animal Rights Debate. Abolition or Regulation? Nueva York: Columbia University Press.
Kant, I. (2002). Lecciones de Ética. Barcelona: Crítica.
Milligan, T. (2015). The Political Turn in Animal Rights. Politics and Animals, 1 (1) 6-15.
Mosterín, J. (2014). El triunfo de la compasión. Nuestra relación con los otros animales. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Peces-Barba, G. (2004). Lecciones de Derechos Fundamentales. Madrid: Dykinson.
Rey Pérez, J. L. (2007). La naturaleza de los derechos sociales. Derechos y Libertades, 137-156.
Safran Foer, J. (2012). Comer animales, trad. T. Hill Gumbao. Barcelona: Seix Barral.
Singer, P. (2011). Liberación animal. El clásico definitivo del movimiento animalista. Madrid: Taurus.
Tirado, C. R. (2016). La dimensión política de las éticas animales en el contexto de la bioética: problemas de integración y desafíos futuros. Revista Iberoamericana de Bioética, 1, 2-13.
Vicedo, M., (1999). Vive y deja vivir. Limbo, 9 59-68.
Wolfon, D. J. y Sullivan, M. (2005). Foxes in the Hen House. Animals, Agribusiness, and the Law: a Modern American Fable. En Sunstein, C. S. y Nussbaum, M. C. (eds.), Animal Rights. Current Debates and New Directions. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors of articles published in Revista Iberoamericana de Bioética retain the intellectual property rights over their works and grant the journal their distribution and public communication rights, consenting to their publication under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivates 4.0 Internacional. Authors are encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages, repositories, etc.) respecting the conditions of this license and quoting appropriately the original source.
