Debates actuales sobre el orden liberal internacional

Matias Ilivitzky

doi:10.14422/cir.i24.y2022.003

Authors

Matias Ilivitzky Universidad del CEMA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14422/cir.i24.y2022.003

Keywords:

international liberal order, complex interdependence, globalization, great power politics, strategic rivalry

Abstract

After the fall of the Cold War, many theories tried to explain the changes that the world was experiencing. One of the most fruitful was the one posed by G. John Ikenberry, stipulating the victory of an international liberal order. The author deemed back then, that the order was greatly expanding and would have a promissory future. However, different perspectives and facts have emerged over time, justifying a revision of the main tenets of the order as well as the way it could evolve in light of current experiences and visions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bauman, Z. (2003). Modernidad líquida. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

BBC mundo. (2021). La catástrofe de la Covid pudo haberse evitado. BBC news mundo. https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-internacional-57089349

Bremmer, I. (2013). Every Nation for Itself: What Happens When No One Leads the World. Portfolio.

Deudney, D. y Ikenberry, J. (1999). The Nature and Sources of the Liberal International Order. Review of International Studies, 25(2), 179-196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210599001795

Easton, D. (1992). Categorías para el análisis sistemático de la política. En A. Battle i Rubio, Diez textos básicos de ciencia política (pp. 221-230). Ariel.

Fukuyama, F. (1989). The End of History? En The National Interest (pp. 3-18). Center for the National Interest.

Haas, R. (2018). A World in Disarray. American Foreign Policy and the Crisis of the Old Order. Penguin Books.

Hattenstone, S. (2021). The transformation of Greta Thunberg. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/ng-interactive/2021/sep/25/greta-thunberg-i-really-see-the-value-of-friendship-apart-from-the-climate-almost-nothing-else-matters

Ikenberry, J. (2002). La gran estrategia liberal y la persistencia del orden hegemónico de Estados Unidos durante la posguerra. Política y gobierno, IX(1), 13-49.

Ikenberry, J. (2020). A World Safe for Democracy. Liberal Internationalism and the Crisis of Global Order. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300256093

Kagan, R. (2018). The Jungle Grows Back: America and Our Imperiled World. Vintage Books.

Keohane, R. y Nye, J. S. (1988). Poder e interdependencia: la política mundial en transición. Grupo Editor Latinoamericano.

Krauthammer, C. (1990): The Unipolar Moment. Foreign Affairs, 70(1), 23-33. https://doi.org/10.2307/20044692

Morgenthau, H. (1992). Política entre las naciones. Buenos Aires, Grupo Editor Latinoamericano.

Muñiz, M. (2019). La implosión del orden liberal. En Ministerio de defensa (ed.), Gobernanza futura: hiperglobalización, mundo multipolar y Estados menguantes (pp. 69-82). Instituto Español de Estudios Estratégicos. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/6831583.pdf

Nye, J. S. (2011). The Future of Power. PublicAffairs.

Nye, J. S. (2017). La trampa de Kindleberger. Project Syndicate. https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/trump-china-kindleberger-trap-by-joseph-s--nye-2017-01/spanish

Putnam, R. D. (1988). Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization, 42(3), 427-460. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027697

Suganami, H. (1989). The domestic analogy and world order proposals. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598807

UN News. (2021). IPCC report: ‘Code red’ for human driven global heating, warns UN chief. https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/08/1097362

Weber, M. (2008). Economía y Sociedad. Fondo de Cultura Económica.