The image of the God to whom we pray: An evolutionary psychobiological perspective
Palabras clave:
God, theology, psychology, biology, evolution, behavior, sensation, Judaism, Christianity, IslamResumen
Based on knowledge generated through our outer senses and with our use of reasoning and within the scientific discipline of evolutionary psychobiology we can make a reasonable presumption about God. The presumption concerns the image of the God to whom we pray. In the behavior that we use in the non-vocal aspect of petitioning prayer we (all persons of the three Abrahamic faiths) relate behaviorally in our «body language» to God as though He is a high status male Lord rather than how modern children relate to a loving father. We do this even though «Father» is used for God in the various English translations of the New Testament an order of magnitude more than the term «LORD». How this paradox could have developed and how it is resolved is presented
Descargas
Citas
ABELOW (2009), «Religious Behavior as a Reflection of Childhood Corporal Punishment». In: JAY R. FEIERMAN (ed.), The Biology of Religious Behavior: The Evolutionary Origins of Faith and Religion, Santa Barbara, California: Praeger/ABC-CLIO, pp. 89-105.
— (2011), «The Shaping of New Testament Narratives and Salvation Teachings by Painful Childhood Experience», Archives for the Psychology of Religion 33(1): 1-54, 2011.
BAILEY, DONALD B.; JOHN T. BRUER, FRANK J. SYMONS and JEFF W. LICHTMAN (eds.) (2001), Critical Thinking about Critical Periods, Baltimore, Maryland: Bookes Publishing Company.
BLOOM, MICHAEL (2009), «The Reproductive Benefits of Religious Affiliation». In: EKART VOLAND and WULF SCHIEFENHÖVEL (eds.), The Biological Evolution of Religious Mind and Behavior, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 117-126.
DIXON, A. F. (1998), Primate Sexuality: Comparative Studies of the Prosimians, Monkeys, Apes and Human Beings, NY: Oxford University Press.
EIBL-EIBESFELDT, IRENÄUS (1975), Ethology: The Biology of Behavior, 2nd edition, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
EIBL-EIBESFELDT, IRENÄUS (1989), Human Ethology, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
EKMAN, PAUL (1991), Telling Lies: Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics and Marriage, NY: W. W. Norton & Co.
ELLIS, THOMAS B. (2009) «Natural Gazes, Non-Natural Agents: The Biology of Religion’s Ocular Behaviors». In JAY R. FEIERMAN (ed.), The Biology of Religious Behavior: The Evolutionary Origins of Faith and Religion, Santa Barbara, California: Praeger/ABC-CLIO, pp. 36-51.
FEIERMAN, JAY R. (2009a), «The Evolutionary History of Religious Behavior». In: JAY R. FEIERMAN (ed.), The Biology of Religious Behavior: The Evolutionary Origins of Faith and Religion, Santa Barbara, California: Praeger/ABC-CLIO, pp. 71-86.
FEIERMAN, JAY R. (2009b), «How Some Major Components of Religion Could Have Evolved by Natural Selection». In: ECKART VOLAND and WULF SCHIEFENHÖVEL (eds.), The Biological Evolution of Religious Mind and Behavior, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 51-66.
— (2011), «Accepted for publication in one of the two European Society for the Study of Science and Theology (ESSSAT) Yearbooks». Will appear in either Studies in Science and Theology or Issues in Science and Theology. A Natural Science Search for the God to Whom We Pray.
HAYDEN, BRIAN (2003), Shams, Sorcers and Saints, Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Books.
IMMELMANN, KLAUS, and COLIN BEER (1989), A Dictionary of Ethology, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
LOEWENSTEIN, WERNER R. (1999), The Touchstone of Life: Molecular Information, Cell Communication and the Foundations of Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MANDELL, A. J. (1980), «Toward a Psychobiology of Transcendence: God in the Brain». In: R. J. DAVIDSON and J. M. DAVIDSON (eds.), The Psychobiology of Transcendence, NY: Plenum Publishing, pp. 379-464.
MILLER, ALAN S., and RODNEY STARK (2002), «Gender and Religiousness: Can Socialization Explanations Be Saved?», American Journal of Sociology 107:1399-1423.
OMARK, DONALD R.; F. F. STRAYER and DANIEL G. FREEDMAN (eds.) (1980), Dominance Relations: An Ethological View of Human Conflict and Social Interaction, NY: Garland STPM Press.
OVIEDO, LLUIS (2009), «Is Religious Behavior “Internally Guided” by Religious Feelings and Needs». In: JAY R. FEIERMAN (ed.), The Biology of Religious Behavior: The Evolutionary Origins of Faith and Religion, Santa Barbara, California: Praeger/ABC-CLIO, pp. 141-156.
REYNOLDS, VERNON, and, RALPH TANNER (1983), The Biology of Religion, London: Longman.
ROSSANO, MATT, «The African Interregnum: The “Where”, “When”, and “Why” of the Evolution of Religion». In: EKART VOLAND andWULF SCHIEFENHÖVEL (eds.), The Biological Evolution of Religious Mind and Behavior, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 127-141.
RYAN, CHRISTOPHER, and CACILDA JETHÁ (2010), Sex at Dawn: The Prehistoric Origins of Modern Sexuality, NY: Harper/HarperCollins Publishers.
SANDERSON, STEPHEN K. (2009), «The Evolution of Religious Behavior in Its Socioecological Contexts». In: JAY R. FEIERMAN (ed.), The Biology of Religious Behavior: The Evolutionary Origins of Faith and Religion, Santa Barbara, California: Prager/ABC-CLIO, pp. 3-19.
SHANNON, C. E. (1948): «A Mathematical Theory of Communication», Bell System Technical Journal 27:379-423 and 623-656, July and October, 1948.
TIGER, LIONEL, and MICHAEL MCGUIRE (2010), God’s Brain, Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
WUNN, I. (2000), «Beginnings of Religion», Numen 47:417-452.
Descargas
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad Pontificia Comillas (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas en Revista Pensamiento.
Está permitida la reutilización del contenido bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Unported.
