La responsabilidad social de la empresa en el pensamiento de los autores clásicos. Origen y desarrollo

Authors

  • José Manuel Rodríguez Carrasco Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14422/icade.i100.y2017.001

Keywords:

CSR, the thought of classic authors, Adam Smith foundations, Bowen modern era

Abstract

The classic authors’ thinking about corporate social responsibility (CSR) is presented in these pages, meaning classics those who have contributed significantly to the development of the economy and business administration during the XIX and XX centuries. It discusses the start date of this stream of thought, although it seems obvious that Adam Smith already laid the foundations.

 

 

References

Arrow, K. (1973). Social Responsibility and Economic Efficiency. Public Policy, 52-66. Citado por Mintzberg, H., 1992.

Berle, A. & Means, G. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. Nueva York: MacMillan.

Bowen, H. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. Nueva York: Harper and Brothers. Obtenido de https://muse.edu>...>Business and Society.

Brooks, J. (1962). Communication and Collusion: The Case of the Electrical Industry. En Samuelson, P. et al. (1967). Readings in Economics (pp. 217-229). Nueva York: McGraw-Hill.

Brown, J. & Forster, W. (2013). CSR and Stakeholder Theory: A Tale of Adam Smith. Journal of Business Ethics, 112 (2), 301-312.

Buehler, V. & Shetty, Y. (1975). Managing Corporate Social Responsibility. Management Review, 64 (8), 5- 17.

Carroll, A. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. Academy of Management Review, 4 (4), 497-505.

– (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34 (4), 39-48,

– (2009). A History of Corporate Social Responsibility: Concepts and Practices. En Andrew, C. et al. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Castillo, J. (1994). El taylorismo hoy: ¿Arqueología Industrial? En El trabajo del sociólogo (pp. 59-77). Madrid: Editorial Complutense.

Comisión Europea (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility. Obtenido de http://www.ec.europa.eu/.../corporate-social-responsibility.

Dasgupta, S. & Ghatge, A. (2015). Understanding the Theoretical Convergence of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in Practice: A Thematic Analysis of Automobile Websites. International Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 6 (2), 175-183.

David, D. (1949). Business Responsibilities in an Uncertain World. Harvard Business Review, 27 (3), 1-8. Citado por Spector, B. (2008).

Davis, K. & Blomstrom, R. (1966). Business and its Environment. Nueva York: McGraw-Hill.

Dempsey, B. (1949). The Roots of Business Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 27 (4), 393-404. Citado por Spector, B. (2008).

Drucker, P. (1970). La Gerencia de Empresas. Buenos Aires: Editorial Sudamericana.

– (1976). La Gerencia, Tareas, Responsabilidades y Prácticas. Buenos Aires: El Ateneo Editorial.

Ferrer, I. (2014). Responsabilidad social y responsabilidad limitada en Milton Friedman. De un modelo shareholder hacia un modelo stakeholder. Revista Ciencias Sociales, 20 (4), 633-643.

Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism & Freedom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

– (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. The New York Times Magazine 13 de septiembre. Obtenido de http://www.umich.edu/...thecore/doc/Friedman.pdf.

Gantt, H. (1919). Organizing for Work. Nueva York: Harcourt, Brave and Howe. Obtenido de http:// www.ganttchart.com/organizingforwork.pdf.

García Ruiz, J. (2003). Grandes creadores en la historia del management. Barcelona: Ariel.

Garrett, T. (1963). Ethics in Business. Nueva York: Sheed and Ward.

George, C. (1968). The history of management thought. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Gómez Camacho, F. (1999). El pensamiento económico en la Escuela de Salamanca. En Fuentes Quintana, E., Economía y Economistas Españoles, 2, 177-207.

Goodpaster, K. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility. The Shape of a History 1945-2004. Minneapolis: Center for Ethical Business Cultures.

Grant, C, (1991). Friedman Fallacies. Journal of Business Ethics, 10 (12), 907-914.

Grice-Hutchinson, M. (1999). En torno a la Escuela de Salamanca. En Fuentes Quintana, E., Economía y Economistas Españoles, 2, 163-176.

Heilbroner, R. (1980). Adam Smith. Encyclopaedia Britannica, 16, 15 edición, Chicago: Helen Hemingway Benton.

James, H. & Rassekh, F. (2000). Smith, Friedman and Self-Interest in Ethical Society. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10 (1), 659-674.

Kanigel, R. (1997). The One Best Way: Frederick Winslow Taylor and the Enigma of Efficiency. Nueva York: The MIT Press.

Levitt, T. (1958). The Danger of Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 36 (5), 41-50.

Mackey, J. (2005). Rethinking the Social Responssibility of Business. John Mackey’ blog. www.wholefoodsmarket.com/blog/. Respuesta de Friedman en dicho blog: «Making Philantropy out of Obscenity».

Mintzberg, H. (1983). The case for Social Responsibility. Journal of Busines Strategy, 4, 3-15.

– (1992). El poder en la Organización. Barcelona: Ariel.

Nader, R. (1965). Unsafe at any Speed. Nueva York: Grossman.

– et al. (1976). Taming the Giant Corporation. Nueva York: Norton.

Pinar Palacios, J. (2015). Responsabilidad Social Corporativa y Resultados: un análisis comparado de las fórmulas de gestión directa en hospitales del Sistema Nacional de Salud. Madrid: Universidad Rey Juan Carlos.

Porter, M. & Kramer, M. (2002). The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80 (12), 56-68.

– (2006). Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review. 84 (12), 78-92.

Preston, L. (1975). Corporation and Society: The Search for a Paradigm. Journal of Economic Literature, 13 (2), 434-453.

Rodríguez Carrasco, J. (2014). Taylorismo. La revolución mental que llega a Europa. Madrid: UNED.

Salazar, J. & Husted, W. (2009). Principals and Agents. Further Thoughts on the Friedmanite Critique of Corporate Social Responsibility. En Andrew, C. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Samuelson, P. (1971). Love that Corporation. Mountain Bell Magazine, citado por Dasgupta, S. & Ghatge, A. (2015).

Sánchez-Albornoz, N. (1999). Entre la tradición escolástica y la práctica mercantil: Tomás de Mercado. En Fuentes Quintana, E., Economía y Economistas Españoles, 2, 243-247.

Schwartz, M. & Carroll, A. (2003). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three Domain Approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13 (4), 503-530.

Sheldon, O. (1970). La Filosofía del Management. Barcelona: Oikos-tau.

Smith, A. (1909). The Wealth of Nations. Nueva York: Collier & Son.

– (1984). The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Indianapolis: Liberty Funds.

Spector, B. (2008). Business Responsibilities in a Divided World’: The Cold War Roots of the Corporate Social Responsibility Movement. En Business History Conference (pp. 314-336). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Talidomida (s.f.). Obtenido de http://es.wikipedia/org/wiki/Talidomida.

Vanderkam, L. (2013). What business owe the world: Then and Now. Fortune, Obtenido de http://www.fortune.com/2013/06/12.

Wren, D. (1987). The Evolution of Management Thought. Nueva York: John Wiley and Sons.

Published

2017-09-29

How to Cite

Rodríguez Carrasco, J. M. (2017). La responsabilidad social de la empresa en el pensamiento de los autores clásicos. Origen y desarrollo. Icade. Journal of the Faculty of Law at Universidad Pontificia Comillas, (100). https://doi.org/10.14422/icade.i100.y2017.001