Artificial Intelligence and Autonomy: Considerations on Ethical Dilemmas in the Novelated Fictional Case… “A Clockwork Orange”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14422/rib.i25.y2024.009Keywords:
bioethics, communication, doctor-patient relationship, artificial intelligence, autonomyAbstract
The following work discusses therapeutic advances that involve modifications in human bodies. One of the main questions includes clinical trials, research subjects and the ability to decide. Ethical-communicational aspects in the relationship between researcher and research subject and doctor-patient will be analyzed. Should the possibility of an innovative treatment in which technologies that modify their organism be put into dialogue between researcher and research subject, or between doctor and patient?
In turn, the specific cut of clinical trials in people deprived of liberty will be analyzed, taking as an analogy the fictional case of A Clockwork Orange to reflect on the autonomous decision in extreme circumstances from a bioethical perspective while we will try to respond to the question: Is the artificial modification of being an ethical way of solving social problems?
Downloads
References
Asociación Médica Mundial. (2013). Declaración de Helsinki. https://www.wma.net/es/policies-post/declaracion-de-helsinki-de-la-amm-principios-eticos-para-las-investigaciones-medicas-en-seres-humanos/
Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Kim, R., Schulz, J., Henrich, J., Shariff, A., Bonnefon, J. F. y Rahwan, I. (2018). The Moral Machine experiment. Nature, 563, 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6
Beauchamp, T. y Childress, F. (2019). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (8.ª ed.). Oxford University Press.
Burgess, A. (2005). La naranja mecánica. Minotauro.
Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. (2008). Principios y Buenas Prácticas sobre la Protección de las Personas Privadas de Libertad en las Américas. https://www.oas.org/es/CIDH/jsForm/?File=/es/cidh/mandato/basicos/principiosppl.asp
Dove, E. S., Chico, V., Fay, M., Laurie, G., Lucassen, A. M. y Postan, E. (2019). Familial genetic risks: how can we better navigate patient confidentiality and appropriate risk disclosure to relatives? Journal of Medical Ethics, 45(8), 504-507. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2018-105229
Foucault, M. (2003). Vigilar y Castigar: Nacimiento de la prisión. https://www.ivanillich.org.mx/Foucault-Castigar.pdf
Hans, J. (1995). El principio de responsabilidad. Ensayo de una ética para la civilización tecnológica. Herder.
Kant, I. (1999). Fundamentación de la metafísica de las costumbres. Biblioteca virtual Miguel de Cervantes. https://www.cervantesvirtual.com/nd/ark:/59851/bmcg44m4
Luna, F. (2009). Elucidating the Concept of Vulnerability: Layers Not Labels. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 2(1), 121-139. https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.2.1.121
Mill, J. S. (2004). El Utilitarismo. Biblioteca Virtual Antorcha. http://www.antorcha.net/biblioteca_virtual/filosofia/utilitarismo/indice.html
Ministerio de Justicia y Derechos Humanos Argentina. (2018, 02 de febrero). Qué son las reglas Mandela. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/noticias/que-son-las-reglas-mandela
Oficina de las Naciones Unidas contra la Droga y el Delito. (2015). Reglas mínimas de las naciones unidas para el tratamiento de los reclusos (Reglas Nelson Mandela). https://www.unodc.org/documents/justice-and-prison-reform/Nelson_Mandela_Rules-S-ebook.pdf
Ortúzar, de. (2021). Clase 2. El concepto de autonomía y su aplicación a la práctica sanitaria a través del “consentimiento informado”. Fundamentación teórica y revisión crítica. Especialización en bioética. FLACSO.
Salas, S. (2022). Consideraciones éticas respecto de la inteligencia artificial. Bioeticar Asociación Civil.
Sibilia, P. (2005). El hombre postorgánico. Cuerpo, subjetividad y tecnologías digitales. Fondo de Cultura Económica de Argentina S. A.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ailin Irina Gurfein
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors of articles published in Revista Iberoamericana de Bioética retain the intellectual property rights over their works and grant the journal their distribution and public communication rights, consenting to their publication under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivates 4.0 Internacional. Authors are encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages, repositories, etc.) respecting the conditions of this license and quoting appropriately the original source.
