Does Law 14874, A New Ethical Regulation of Research with Human Beings in Brazil, Violate Human Rights?

Carlos Adriano Silva dos Santos; Rosamaría Gomes

doi:10.14422/rib.i26.y2024.008

Autores/as

Carlos Adriano Silva dos Santos Faculdade de Medicina do CESMAC
Rosamaría Gomes Faculdade de Medicina do CESMAC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14422/rib.i26.y2024.008

Palabras clave:

bioethics, research ethics, human rights abuses, experimental drugs, health vulnerability

Resumen

Free, post-study and indefinite access to the best prophylactic, diagnostic and therapeutic method that has been demonstrated to be effective during the study is a fundamental condition for protecting research participants. Since its inception in ethical regulations for research with human beings, Brazil has made this condition a cornerstone of protection for study participants. Through a qualitative analysis of Chapter VI of Law 14874, a new Law that regulates research with human beings in Brazil it was possible to perceive that there was a regression in the protection and recognition of the fundamental rights and dignity of the human beings participating in the research.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

Brasil (1988, October 5). Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. Planalto. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm

Brasil (1996, October 10). Resolução 196. Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Ministério da Saúde. https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/cns/1996/res0196_10_10_1996.html

Brasil (1997, August 7). Resolução 251. Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Ministério da Saúde. https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/cns/1997/res0251_07_08_1997.html

Brasil (2008, August 1). Resolução 404. Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Ministério da Saúde. https://conselho.saude.gov.br/resolucoes/reso_08.htm

Brasil (2012, Decembrer 12). Resolução 466. Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Ministério da Saúde. https://conselho.saude.gov.br/resolucoes/2012/Reso466.pdf

Brasil (2024, May 28). Lei Ordinária no 14.874. Câmara dos Deputados. https://www2.camara.leg.br/legin/fed/lei/2024/lei-14874-28-maio-2024-795693-norma-pl.html

Cook, K., Snyder, J., & Calvert, J. (2015). Canadian research ethics board members’ attitudes toward benefits from clinical trials. BMC Medical Ethics, 16(84). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0079-8

Dainesi, S. M., & Goldbaum, M. (2012). Post-trial access to study medication: a Brazilian e-survey with major stakeholders in clinical research. Journal of Medical Ethics, 38(12), 757-62. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2011-100127

Geissler, P. W., Kelly, A., Imoukhuede, B., & Pool, R. (2008). “He Is Now Like a Brother, I Can Even Give Him Some Blood”: Relational Ethics and Material Exchanges in a Malaria Vaccine “Trial Community” in The Gambia. Social Science and Medicine, 67(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.02.004

Hossne, W. S. (2009). Dos referenciais da bioética - a vulnerabilidade. Bioethikos, 3(1), 41-51. http://www.saocamilo-sp.br/pdf/bioethikos/68/41a51.pdf

Lawton, J., Blackburn, M., Rankin, D., Werner, C., Farrington, C., Hovorka, R., & Hallowell, N. (2019). Broadening the Debate About Post-trial Access to Medical Interventions: A Qualitative Study of Participant Experiences at the End of a Trial Investigating a Medical Device to Support Type 1 Diabetes Self-Management. AJOB Empirical Bioethics, 10(2), 100-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2019.1592264

Lázaro-Muñoz, G., Pham, M. T., Muñoz, K. A., Kostick-Quenet, K., Sanchez, C. E., Torgerson, L., Robinson, J., Pereira, S., Outram, S., Koenig, B. A., Starr, P. A., Gunduz, A., Foote, K. D., Okun, M. S., Goodman, W., Mc-Guire, A. L., & Zuk, P. (2022). Post-trial access in implanted neural device research: Device maintenance, abandonment, and cost. Brain Stimulation, 15(5), 1029-1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2022.07.051

Liberman, F., Elgart, J., & Strusberg, I. (2019). Economic Benefit of Sponsored Controlled Clinical Trials: The Avoidable Cost in Drugs for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Value in Health Regional Issues, 20,7-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2018.10.007

Moraes, A. (2023). Direitos Humanos Fundamentais: Teoria geral. Atlas.

Silva dos Santos, C. A. (2018). Regulamentação ética das pesquisas no Brasil: precisamos de uma Resolução específica para Ciências Sociais e Humanas? Revista Iberoamericana de Bioética, (6), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.14422/rib.i06.y2018.007

Wendland, C. L. (2008). Research, Therapy, and Bioethical Hegemony: The Controversy over Perinatal AZT Trials in Africa. African Studies Review, 51(3), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1353/arw.0.0084