The object of desire: desiring production in the schizoanalysis of Deleuze and Guattari or missing in the psychoanalytic theory of Jacques Lacan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14422/pen.v75.i285.y2019.009Keywords:
desire, Deleuze, lack, Lacan, psychoanalysisAbstract
French psychoanalyst Jacques Lacan thinks the object of desire as a missing object that cannot be represented. Meanwhile, Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari reject in Anti-Oedipus (1972) any conception that relates desire to lack and defend that desire is a producing process of a real and present object. In their view Lacanian psychoanalysis condemns desiring subjects to a melancholic and perpetual dissatisfaction. The main objective of this article is to refute this view according to next three arguments: a distinction between lack and deprivation, the consideration of failure as not necessarily negative and the thesis that limited and partially unsatisfied desire is more liberating than a massively filled up desire.Downloads
References
Castellanos, B. (2011). «La crítica de Deleuze al psicoanálisis: el proyecto de un deseo políticamente constituyente». Madrid: UNED. Tesis doctoral inédita.
Cottet, S. (1996). «Les machines psychanalytiques de Gilles Deleuze» en La cause freudienne, vol 32, p. 15-19).
David-Ménard, M. (2005). Deleuze et la psychanalyse. L’altercation, Paris: PUF.
Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1985). El Antiedipo. Capitalismo y esquizofrenia, Barcelona: Paidós.
— (2004). Mil mesetas. Capitalismo y esquizofrenia, Valencia: Pretextos.
Deleuze, G.& Parnet, C. (1997). L’Abécédaire de Gilles Deleuze. Paris: Editions Montparnasse.
Fernández, M. (2009). La repetición como concepto fundamental del psicoanálisis, Caracas: Capitón.
Freud, S. (1991). «Análisis terminable e interminable» en Obras completas. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu, vol. 23, p. 211-254.
Hallward, P. (1010). «You Can’t Have it Both Ways: Deleuze or Lacan», en L. de Bolle, Deleuze and psychanalysis. Philosophical Essays on Deleuze’s Debate with Psychoanalysis, Leuven: University Press, pp. 33-50.
Heidegger, M. (2012). Ser y tiempo. Madrid: Trotta.
Kant, I. (1984). Crítica del juicio, Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
Lacan, J. (2005). Escritos, Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
— (2008).Seminario 2. El yo en la teoría de Freud y en la técnica psicoanalítica. 1954-55, Buenos Aires: Paidós.
— (1994).Seminario 4. La relación de objeto. 1956-57, Barcelona: Paidós.
— (2005).Seminario 5. Las formaciones del inconsciente. 1957-58, Barcelona: Paidós.
— (2006).Seminario 10. La angustia. 1962-63, Buenos Aires: Paidós.
— (1995).Seminario 11. Los cuatro conceptos fundamentales del psicoanálisis. 1964, Buenos Aires: Paidós.
— (2012).Seminario 19. O peor... 1971-72, Buenos Aires: Paidós.
— (1987).Seminario 20. Aún… 1972-73, Buenos Aires: Paidós.
— (2006).Seminario 23. El sinthome. 1975-76, Buenos Aires: Paidós, 2006.
Lacan, J. (1979). «Lacan pour Vincennes!», en Ornicar?. Bolletin periodique du Champ Freudien, nº.17/18.
Sartre, J.-P. (1983). El ser y la nada, Buenos Aires: Losada, 2º volumen.
Platón (1988). Diálogos III. Fedón, Banquete, Fedro, Madrid: Gredos.
Smith D.W. (2004). «The Inverse Side of the Structure: Žižek on Deleuze on Lacan», Criticism, 46.
Žižek, S. (2004). Organs Without Bodies: On Deleuze and Consequences. New York-London: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The publishing Universidad Pontificia Comillas retain the copyright of articles published in Pensamiento. Reuse of content is allowed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivates 3.0 Unported. Authors are encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages, repositories, etc.) respecting the conditions of this license and quoting appropriately the original source.
