Religious knowledge in the light of Kuhn’s and Lakatos’ methodological conceptions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14422/pen.v78.i298.y2022.022Keywords:
scientific methodologies, religious beliefs, Thomas Kuhn, Imre Lakatos, Nancey MurphyAbstract
The article based on Kuhn’s paradigmatic approach and Lakatos’ methodology of scientific research programmes, analyses certain aspects of selected cognitive functions of religous beliefs. Our approach is based on the search for angalogy between scientific theories on one hand and systems of religious beliefs on the other hand. Contemporary philosophy of science demonstrates that scientific models are the products of creative analogous immagination, data are theory-laden, theories as a whole are resistent to falsification and it is hard (if at all) to find reliable criterions for the selection of a paradigm. These «subjective features» are more evident within religion, since a wider range of models, greater impact of interpretations on data, greater arduousness in regard to the commitment to a paradigm and more ambiguity in the process of the selection of a paradigm, exist in this area. However, with each of these features, I see the difference between science and religion in their degree and not in absolute contrast.
Downloads
References
Ayer, A. J. (1971). Language, Truth, and Logic. London: Penguin Books.
Barbour, I. G. (1976). Myths, Models and Paradigm: A comparative Study in Science and Religion. New York, Hagerstown, San Francisco, London, Harper & Row Publishers.
Barbour, I. G. (2013). Religion and Science, San Francisco, HarperCollins Publishers.
Dennett, D. C. (2007). Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. New York: Penguin Books.
Dewey, J. (1925). Experince and Nature. Chicago: Open Court.
Draper, J. W. (1874). History of the Conflict between Religion and Science. New York: D. Appleton.
Fiorenza, E. S. (1983). In Memory of Her: A Feminist Theological Reconstruction of Christian Origins. New York: Crossroad.
Flew, A. and Macintyre, A. (1955). New Essays in Philosophical Theology. London: SCM Press.
Hick, J. (2009). Faith and Knowledge. Eugene, Wipf and Stock Publishers.
Jeffner, A. (1972). The Study of Religious Language. London: SCM Press.
Klaaren, E. (1977). Religious Origins of Modern Science: Belief in Creation in Seventeenth-Century Thought. Grand Rapids, MI, Eerdmans.
Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (3rd ed.) Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Küng, H. and Tracy, D. (eds.) (1991). Paradigm Change in Theology: A Symposium for the Future. New York: NY, Crossroad.
Lakatos, I. (1970). «Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes», in: Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mitchell, B. (1973). The Justification of Religious Belief. London: Macmillan.
Murphy, N. (1996). Beyond Liberalism and Fundamentalism: How Modern and Postmodern Philosophy Set the Theological Agenda. Valley Forge: Trinity Press International.
Murphy, N. (1990a) «Scientific Realism and Postmodern Philosophy», in: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 291-303.
Murphy, N. (1990b). Theology in the Age of Scientific Reasoning. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Murphy, N. (1988). Theology: «An Experimental Science?», in: Perspectives in Religious Studies, Vol. 3., pp. 219-234.
Phillips, D. Z. (2013). Faith and Philosophical Enquiry. New York: Routledge.
Raschke, C. A. (2004). The Next Reformation: Why Evangelicals must Embrace Postmodernity. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.
Smith, J. E. (1968). Experience and God. New York: Oxford University Press.
Southgate, CH. (2005). God, Humanity, and the Cosmos. London, New York: T&T Clark International.
Tracy, D. (1987). Plurality and Ambiguity: Hemeneutics, Religion, Hope. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
White, A. D. (1896). History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom. New York: D. Appleton and Company.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The publishing Universidad Pontificia Comillas retain the copyright of articles published in Pensamiento. Reuse of content is allowed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivates 3.0 Unported. Authors are encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages, repositories, etc.) respecting the conditions of this license and quoting appropriately the original source.
