The self-sufficiency of the political order in Dante Alighieri

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14422/pen.v79.i305.y2023.007

Keywords:

Dante, Church, Empire, Averroism, Aristotelianism

Abstract

The aim of this article is to retrace the fundamental premises of Dante’s political thought, which posits a new conception of the relationship between Church and Empire. In particular, three fundamental ideas are pointed out: science as the ultimate perfection of the human soul; the proper operation of the human race in the action of all the possible power of the intellect; and finally the question of the natural and supernatural purpose of man. Secondly, the presence of the interpretation of Aristotelianism of the Faculty of Arts of the University of Paris and of Averroism in the Dantesque approach is analysed, in particular with reference to the different interpretations of Gilson and Nardi. Finally, the question of the transfer of the keys from Jesus to Peter and the relationship between nature and grace in dissonance with the interpretation of Thomas Aquinas are proposed as a key to the overall interpretation of Dantesque political thought.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agamben, G. (1992). «Forma-di-vita», en Zanardi, M., Política. Nápoles: Cronopio.

Agustín de Hipona (2007). La ciudad de Dios. Madrid: BAC, 2 vols.

Bianchi, L. (2018). «“Ultima perfezione” e “ultima felicitade”. Ancora su Dante e l’averroismo», en L. Bianchi (ed.), Edizioni, traduzioni e tradizioni filosofiche (secoli XII-XVI). Roma: Aracne Editrice, 315-328.

Bertelloni, F. (2012). «Marsilio de Padua y la filosofía política medieval», en Bertelloni, F.; Burlando, G. (eds.), La filosofía medieval. Madrid: Trotta, 237-262.

Busnelli, G. (1922). Cosmogonia e Antropogenesi secondo Dante Alighieri e le sue fonti. Roma: Civiltà Cattolica.

Dante Alighieri (1922). De Monarchia. Madrid: Tecnos.

Dante Alighieri (2008). Convivio. Buenos Aires: Colihue.

Dante Alighieri (2009). La Divina Commedia, 3 vols. Milano: Mondadori.

Dempf, A. (1988). Sacrum Imperium. Firenze: Le lettere.

Denzinger, H. (2000). Hünermann, P., El magisterio de la Iglesia. Enchiridion symbolorum definitionum et declarationum de rebus fidei et morum. Barcelona: Herder.

Gilson, E. (2004). Dante y la filosofía. Navarra: Eunsa.

Gilson, E. (1965). La metamorfosis de la Ciudad de Dios. Madrid: Rialp.

Kantorowicz, E. (1957). Los dos cuerpos del Rey. Madrid: Alianza.

Nardi, B. (1960). Dal «Convivio» alla «Commedia» (Sei saggi danteschi). Roma: Istituto Storico Italiano per il Medio Evo.

Nardi, B. (1944). «Dante e la filosofia», en Nardi, B. (ed.), Nel mondo di Dante. Roma: Storia e Letteratura.

Pérez Carrasco, M. (2015). «En el giro moderno hacia la inmanencia. A propósito del “Siger de Brabante” de Eric Voegelin», en Deus Mortalis, 11, 185-209.

Tomás de Aquino (2012). De Regno. Madrid: Tecnos.

Tomás de Aquino (2022). Quaestiones disputatae de anima, q.5, c. [Consultado el 29/07/2022, en el Corpus Thomisticum on line: https://www.corpusthomisticum.org/qda01.html].

Tomás de Aquino (1953). Suma contra Gentiles. Madrid: BAC, 2 vols.

Tomás de Aquino (2022). Suma Teológica [Consultado el 29/07/2022: https://hjg.com.ar/sumat/b/c3.html#a2].

Toscano, A. (1981). «Dante: il discorso aristotelico nella Monarchia», en Forum Italicum: A Journal of Italian Studies 15(2-3), 139-152.

Vasoli, C. (1995). «Fonti Albertine nel Convivio Di Dante», en Hoenen, M. y de Libera, A. (eds), Albertus Magnus und der Albertismus. Leiden: Brill, 33-49.

Voegelin, E. (1944). «Siger de Brabant», en Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 4 (4), p. 507-526.

Published

2024-03-01

How to Cite

Abbate, S. (2024). The self-sufficiency of the political order in Dante Alighieri. Pensamiento. Revista De Investigación E Información Filosófica, 79(305), 1591–1606. https://doi.org/10.14422/pen.v79.i305.y2023.007