Being and «genera» of being in Ancient Stoicism. A relevant ontological distinction applied to ethics and action theory

Authors

  • Marcelo D. Boeri Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Chile

Keywords:

genera of being, categories, Stoicism

Abstract

This paper is focused on the Stoic doctrine of genera of being and the way in which such a doctrine appears to function in ethics and in action theory. In section I, the soul-body problem in Aristotle is briefly discussed; I argue that, in order to overcome the difficulties of the relation between soul and body in a psychology maintaining that the soul is an immaterial entity, the Stoics were willing to endorse a physicalist psychology. Second, I offer an account of the Stoic ontology and attempt to show the role of each genera of being in such an ontology. In section III I return to the Stoic genera of being but concentrating on the suitable connections to make more persuasive the thesis that the Stoic genera of being should play a role in ethics and in action theory. Finally, in section IV I present some concluding remarks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALESSE, F. (2000): La Stoa e la tradizione socratica, Napoli.

ANNAS, J. E. (1992): Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, Berkeley-Los Angeles-London.

ARNIM, VON H. (1903-1905): (SVF) Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta, 3 vols., Leipzig (índice preparado por M. Adler, Leipzig 1924), Stuttgart.

BASTIANINI, G. - LONG, A. A. (1992): «Hiercocles», en Corpus dei papyri filosofici greci e latini, Firenze, 268-451 (introducción, texto griego, traducción italiana y comentario filosófico).

BOERI, M. D. (1992): «La transmisión del concepto estoico de causa sinéctica», en Méthexis, V, 99-121.

— (1997): «Wert und Funktion der Kategorienlehre bei Aristoteles», en N. ÖFFENBERGER - A. G. VIGO (eds.), Zur modernen Deutung der aristotelischen Logik. Südamerikanische Beiträge zur modernen Deutung der aristotelischen Logik, Hildescheim-Zürich-New York, 82-106.

BOERI, M. D. (2001): «The Stoics on Bodies and Incorporeals», en The Review of Metaphysics, 24, 723-752.

— (2003): Aristóteles, Física VII-VIII (traducción, introducción y comentario), Buenos Aires.

— (2005): «The Presence of Socrates and Aristotle in the Stoic Account of akrasia», en R. SALLES (ed.), Metaphysics, Soul and Ethics. Themes from the Work of Richard Sorabji, Oxford 2005, 383-412.

— (2009): «Causa sinéctica y actividad neumática en los estoicos», en Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofía, vol. XXXV, n.º 1, 5-34.

BRÉHIER, É. (1970): La théorie des incorporels dans l’ancien stoïcisme, Paris.

GEACH, P. T. (1969): God and the Soul, London.

GILL, C. (1998): «Did Galen understand Platonic and Stoic Thinking on Emotions?», en J. SIHVOLA - T. ENGBERG-PEDERSEN (eds.), The Emotions in Hellenistic Philosophy, Dordrecht-Boston-London, 113-169.

GRAESER, A. (1978): «The Stoic Categories», en BRUNSCHWIG, J. (ed.), Les stoiciens et leur logique, Paris, 199-221.

HÜLSER, K. (1987-1988): (FDS) Die Fragmente zur Dialektik der Stoiker, Stuttgart.

LONG, A. A. (1971): «Language and Thought in Stoicism», en LONG, A. A. (ed.) Problems in Stoicism, London, 75-113.

LONG, A. A. - SEDLEY, D. N. (1987): (LS) The Hellenistic Philosophers, Cambridge (2 vols.).

MEINEKE, A. (1860): Ioannis Stobaei Eclogarum Physicarum et Ethicarum Libri Duo (recensuit Augustus Meineke), Leipsiae.

MENN, S. (1999): «The Stoic Theory of Categories», en Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 215-247.

NUSSBAUM, M. C. (1985): Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium [Text with Translation, Commentary and Interpretative Essays, Princeton (reedición corregida)].

STRIKER, G. (1996): Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics, Cambridge.

WACHSMUTH, C. (1884): Ioannis Stobaei Anthologii libri duo priores qui inscribi solent Eclogae physicae et ethicae, Berlin.

How to Cite

Boeri, M. D. (2014). Being and «genera» of being in Ancient Stoicism. A relevant ontological distinction applied to ethics and action theory. Pensamiento. Revista De Investigación E Información Filosófica, 66(247), 35–54. Retrieved from https://revistas.comillas.edu/index.php/pensamiento/article/view/2278