The artifact-character of the statement in the heideggerian philosophy of the 1920’s: an analysis and critique of Robert Brandom’s and Rainer Bast’s interpretations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14422/pen.v72.i270.y2016.007Keywords:
artifact, statement, Heidegger, Brandom, BastAbstract
This research attempts to approach a discussion which derives from the study of the 1920’s Heideggerian philosophy: the issue that we propose to analyze could be expressed throug the question: is the statement an artifact, a mode of taking care (of) [Besorgen] , or none of those? In order to provide an answer for this question, we shall crittically attend to the interpretations of two important commentators of Heidegger’s works, who have reflected upon the theme, and offered their own readings: Robert Brandom and Rainer Bast. As a conclusion we will propose our own reading, in an attempt to unify the discussed subjects and suggest an integrative of the heideggerian approaches on the artefactual character of the statement.Downloads
References
BAST, R. (1986), Der Wissenschaftbegriff Martin Heideggers im Zusammenhang seiner Philosophie, Tübingen, Frommann-Holzboog.
BRANDOM, R. (2002a), “Heidegger’s Cathegories in Sein und Zeit” en Tales of the Mighty dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality, Harvard University press, Cambridge, Massachusetts/London, England
(2002b), “Dasein, the Being that Thematizes” en Tales of the Mighty dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality, Harvard University press, Cambridge, Massachusetts/ London, England
GETHMANN, K. F. (1974), Verstehen und Auslegung, Bonn, Bouvier
(1991) “Der existenziale Begriff der Wissenschaft. Zu Sein und Zeit, § 69b” en Gethmann, K. F (Hrsg.) Lebenswelt und Wissenschaft. Studien zum Verhältnis von Phänomenologie und Wissenschaftstheorie, Bonn, Bouvier.
HEIDEGGER, M. (1992), Platon: Sophistes, Vittorio Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main.
(2000), Los problemas fundamentales de la fenomenología, Trad. y prólogo de Juan José García Norro, Trotta, Madrid.
(2002), Interpretaciones fenomenológicas sobre Aristóteles, indicación de la situación hermenéutica [informe Natorp],Trad. de Jesús Adrián Escudero, Trotta, Madrid.
(2006), Ser y Tiempo, Traducción y notas de Jorge Eduardo Rivera, Trotta, Madrid.
(2007a), Prolegómenos para una historia del concepto de tiempo, Traducción de Jaime Aspiunza, Alianza, Madrid.
(2007b), Principios metafísicos de la lógica Traducción de Juan José García Norro, Síntesis, Madrid.
(2010), Los conceptos fundamentales de la metafísica: Mundo, finitud, soledad” Traducción de Alberto Ciria, Alianza, Madrid.
TUGENDHAT, E. (1970), Der Warheitsbegriff bei Husserl und Heidegger, Walter de Gruyter & Co, Berlin.
VIGO, A. (2008), Arqueología y aletheiología y otros estudios heideggerianos, Biblos, Buenos Aires.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The publishing Universidad Pontificia Comillas retain the copyright of articles published in Pensamiento. Reuse of content is allowed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivates 3.0 Unported. Authors are encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages, repositories, etc.) respecting the conditions of this license and quoting appropriately the original source.
