Schelling against Jacobi. The possibility of a system of freedom

Authors

  • Hernán Guerrero Troncoso Universidad Católica del Maule

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14422/pen.v72.i271.y2016.004

Keywords:

german Idealism, ontology, pantheism, Spinoza, will

Abstract

The intention of this article is to show how the examination of the alleged pantheism of Spinozas’ system, which opens the Philosophical Inquiries into the Essence of Human Freedom of Schelling, presents not only his own stand concerning the Pantheism controversy, but also implies a discussion with Modern thought, particularly regarding the place, function and implications of the notion of system, and its relation to freedom. An exposition of Jacobi’s critical analysis of the history of Western Philosophy —where he asserts that the system is incompatible with the knowledge of the unconditioned— will illustrate the terms of this dialogue of the philosopher from Leonberg with the tradition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BEISER, F. C. (1987) The Fate of Reason. German Philosophy from Kant to Fichte. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

BROWN, J. V. (1976) «John Duns Scotus on Henry of Ghent’s Arguments for Divine Illumination: The Statement of the Case». Vivarium 14, 94-113.

— (1984) «Duns Scotus on the Possibility of Knowing Genuine Truth: The Reply to Henry of Ghent in the Lectura prima and the Ordinatio». Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 51, 136–182.

CARRASCO CONDE, A. (2011) «Panteísmo y panenteísmo: Schelling, Schlegel y la polémica en torno al panteísmo». Δαίμων. Revista Internacional de Filosofía 54, 93-109.

DESCARTES, R. (1982) Principia Philosophiae. En: Oeuvres de Descartes, ed. Ch. Adam – P. Tannery, nouvelle présentation, en coédition avec le CNRS, vol. 81, Paris: Vrin.

— (1983) Meditationes de Prima Philosophia. En: Oeuvres, vol 7. Duns Scoto, J. (1950) Ordinatio prologus. En: B. Ioannis Duns Scoti Opera omnia, ed. Commissio Scotista, vol. 1. Civitas Vaticana: Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis.

— (1954) Ordinatio I, d. 3. En Opera omnia, vol. 3.

FREUDIGER, J. (1993) «Der Pantheismusstreit – Eine Bestandsaufnahme». Kriterion 5, 39-48.

GUERRERO TRONCOSO, H. (2016) «Ley, naturaleza y gracia. Una lectura escotista de la ley natural en santo Tomás». En: Casanova , C. – Serrano, I. (eds.) Gratia non tollit naturam, sed perficit eam. Sobre las relaciones y límites entre naturaleza y gracia. Actas del Segundo Congreso Internacional de Filosofía Tomista. Santiago: Universidad Santo Tomás – RIL Editores, 413-440.

HEGEL, G. W. F. (1988) Phänomenologie des Geistes. Ed. H.-F. Wessels–H. Clairmont. Hamburg: Meiner.

JACOBI, F. H. (2000) Über die Lehre des Spinoza in Briefe an Herrn Moses Mendelssohn. Ed. Lauschke, M. Hamburg: Meiner.

JAKUSZKO, H. (2009) «The Spinoza Inspiration in the Late German Enlightenment (Spätaufklärung)». Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 15 (28), 173-188.

KAHLEFELD, S. (2000) Dialektik und Sprung in Jacobis Philosophie. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.

KANT, I. (1998) Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Ed. Timmermann, J. Hamburg: Meiner.

PASCAL, B. (1909) Penseés et opuscules. Ed. Brunschvicg, L., 5a edición. Paris: Hachette. Schelling, F. W. J. (2011) Philosophische Untersuchungen über das Wesen der menschlichen Freiheit und die damit zusammenhängende Gegenstände. Ed. Buchheim, Th. Hamburg: Meiner.

— (2013) Zur Geschichte der neueren Philosophie. Münchener Vorlesungen. Ed. Holzinger, M. Berlin: Holzinger.

SPINOZA, B. (2010) Ethica ordine geometrico demonstrata. Ed. Bartuschat, W. Hamburg: Meiner.

WOLF, S. (2013) «Pantheismus und Pantheismuskritik in Schellings Freiheitsschrift». SATS. Northern European Journal of Philosophy 132, 128-146.

WOLFSON, H. A. (1934a–1934b) The Philosophy of Spinoza. Unfolding the Latent Processes of his Reasoning, 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

How to Cite

Guerrero Troncoso, H. (2016). Schelling against Jacobi. The possibility of a system of freedom. Pensamiento. Revista De Investigación E Información Filosófica, 72(271), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.14422/pen.v72.i271.y2016.004