Conditions of Possibility of Knowledge and Spaces of Logic Possibility

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14422/pen.v75.i287.y2019.001

Keywords:

conditions of possibility, space of logical possibility, possible worlds, beliefs, language, knowledge

Abstract

Knowledge construction has been a topic of interest to the philosophy of language, given the need to validate the aletic and apophantic form of statements that constitute such a discourse. For a long time, Classical logic has been in charge of validating the judgments of fact that constitute science; however, in the last few decades, logic modal studies have gained particular strength, with which it is intended to examine, among others, the epistemic statements and beliefs of cognizants from the use of modal operators, among them, those that set the boundaries of the theory of possible worlds. This article aims to show the role of beliefs, language and logic in the conditions of possibility of knowledge, based on a review of the relevance of the theory of possible worlds and the spaces of logical possibility in the Construction and analysis of the scientific discourse.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Angélica María Rodríguez Ortiz, Universidad Autónoma de Manizales

Docente investigador de la Universidad Autónoma de Manizales. Líder del programa de Maestría en Enseñanza de las ciencias en el sistema de educación a distancia UAM.

References

Brandom, R. (2006). Between Saying and Doing: Towards an Analytic Pragmatism. Oxford: Oxford University.

Boberienth, A. (1996). ¿Inconsistencias, por qué no?, un estudio filosófico sobre la lógica paraconsistente. Bogotá, Colcultura.

Dummett (1978). Truth and Other Enigmas. Londres: Duckworth

Frank, J. (1991) Conditionals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Frege, G. (1998). Ensayos sobre la semántica y filosofía de la lógica. Trad. Luis Valdés. Madrid: Tecnos.

Hintikka, J. (1962). Knowledge and belief. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Hintikka, J. (1975). «Impossible possible worlds vindicated». Journal of Philosophical Logic, 4, 475-484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00558761

Kripke, S. (2005). El nombrar y la necesidad. Universidad Autónoma de México. Trad. Margarita Valdés.

Gómez-Caminero, E. (2013). Saber que algo no existe. Lógica epistémica. Valparaiso: Revista del Instituto de Filosofía, 1, 41-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv.2013.1.98

Quine, W. (1981). Theories and Things. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Williamson, Thimothy. (2016). La filosofía de la filosofía. Trad. Fernández, Miguel. México: Instituto de investigaciones filosóficas.

Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Trad. Jacobo Muñoz e Isidoro Reguera En: Reguera, Isidoro (Ed.). Wittgenstien, L., Obra completa. Vol. 1: Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Investigaciones filosóficas. Sobre la certeza. Edición bilingüe. Biblioteca de Grandes Pensadores. Madrid: Editorial Gredos.

Wittgenstein, L. (2009a). Investigaciones filosóficas. Trad. Alfonso García Suarez y Carlos Ulises Moulines. En: Reguera, Isidoro (Ed.). Obra completa. Vol. 1: Tractatus logicophilosophicus. Investigaciones filosóficas. Sobre la certeza. Biblioteca de Grandes Pensadores. Madrid: Editorial Gredos.

Published

2020-01-29

How to Cite

Rodríguez Ortiz, A. M. (2020). Conditions of Possibility of Knowledge and Spaces of Logic Possibility. Pensamiento. Revista De Investigación E Información Filosófica, 75(287), 1393–1410. https://doi.org/10.14422/pen.v75.i287.y2019.001