Back to the end of history: an ethical interpretation of the posthistorical condition in Alexandre Kojève

Authors

  • Oriol Farrés Juste Departamento de Filosofía Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14422/pen.v74.i280.y2018.011

Keywords:

end of history, form of life, animality, humanity, dialectic, ethics, snob

Abstract

The following work aims to analyze and interpret Alexandre Kojève’s theory of the end of history. The context of this research is mainly based on the footnote Kojève added in the second edition (1968) of his book Introduction à la lecture de Hegel. This footnote has led to intense debates and important philosophical questions. In this footnote, the paradigm of Japanese snobbery is taken as an alternative to the final animalization of posthistorical man. In this work, specifically, the kojevian rectification about the end of history will be put in relation to Kojève’s work as a whole, his discussions with authors of his time and the references to the philosophical tradition. All this in order to unravel the ethical implications of the survival of the human in the end of history and its relationship with contemporary postmetaphisical approaches.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agamben, G. (2006). Lo abierto. El hombre y el animal. Buenos Aires: Adriana Hidalgo editora.

Aingeru, R. (2009). «The Japanese End: Japan in Alexandre Kojeve’s End of History», en: International Journal of Area Studies, 3, pp. 63-69.

Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Arendt, H. (1968). Men in Dark Times, New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

Aron, R. (1990). Memoires: 50 ans de réflexion politique. Paris: Julliard.

Auffret, D. (1990). Alexandre Kojève. La philosophie, l’État, la fin de l’Histoire. Paris: Grasset.

Bataille, G. (1996). Lo que entiendo por soberanía. Barcelona: Paidós.

Bloom, A. (1991). Gigantes y enanos. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Darby, T. (1990). The Feast: Meditations on Politics and Time. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Deblin, F. R. (2004). Alexandre Kojève and the Outcome of Modern Thought. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America.

Derrida, J. (1994). Specters of Marx: The state of the debt, the work of mourning and the new international. New York: Routledge.

De Vries, E. (2001). «Alexandre Kojève — Carl Schmitt Correspondence and Alexandre Kojève, “Colonialism from a European Perspective”, en: Interpretation, 29/1, pp. 91–130.

Esquirol, J. M. (2006). «Alexandre Kojève, o com es distreu un hegelià al segle XX», en: Vergés, J. (Ed.). Cons i neocons: El referons filosòfic. Girona: Documenta.

Kojève, A. (1968). Introduction à la lecture de Hegel. Paris: Gallimard.

Kojève, A. (1981). Esquisse d’une phénomenologie du droit. Paris: Gallimard.

Kojève, A. (2006). La noción de Autoridad. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.

Murphy, G. (2011). «Alexandre Kojève: Cosmpolitanism at the End of History», en: Lee

Trepanier & Khalil M. Habib (Eds.), Cosmopolitanism in the Age of Globalization: Citizens without States. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.

Rosen, S. (1987). Hermeneutics as Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Strauss, L. (2000). On Tyranny. Revised and Expanded Edition. Including the Strauss-Kojève Correspondence. (Edited by Victor Gourevitch and Michael S. Roth). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Published

2018-05-16

How to Cite

Farrés Juste, O. (2018). Back to the end of history: an ethical interpretation of the posthistorical condition in Alexandre Kojève. Pensamiento. Revista De Investigación E Información Filosófica, 74(280), 521–540. https://doi.org/10.14422/pen.v74.i280.y2018.011

Issue

Section

Estudios, textos, notas y comentarios