Does Neuroscience lead to a Naturalization of Deontologism? Reflection on the «Deontological Moral Judgments» from a neuroethical approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14422/pen.v73.i276.y2017.024Keywords:
neuroethics, naturalization, deontological moral judgment, joshua greeneAbstract
According to the research in the field of neuroethics and more specifically in the theory of dual process of moral judgment, in authors such as Joshua Greene, we pose the question whether neuroscience leads ineluctably to a «naturalization of Deontologism». So, in my communication I criticize a way of doing neuroscience by reducing deontological moral judgments exclusively to a kind of emotional response. Beyond this model I propose another way of doing «neuroethics» where the psychophysical structures of morality are considered without incurring the myopic reductionist naturalism. According to this second approach, it is about discovering the neuroscience of ethics, namely, the nature of morality without reducing morality to nature. From that approach, neuroscience can contribute to an interdisciplinary work in order to understand the vast human nature in all its breadth.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The publishing Universidad Pontificia Comillas retain the copyright of articles published in Pensamiento. Reuse of content is allowed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivates 3.0 Unported. Authors are encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages, repositories, etc.) respecting the conditions of this license and quoting appropriately the original source.
