Human Dignity: Its Meaning and Relevance in the United States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14422/pen.v81.i313.y2025.004Keywords:
human dignity, concept of person, western tradition, bioethics, Steven PinkerAbstract
«Human dignity» is a term that has been used after World War II to defend human beings from unjust treatment. In the United States, it was introduced to protect those who are unable to give or withhold consent for biomedical procedures. The term has been sharply criticized, however, by materialist philosophers such as Steven Pinker as well as by Thomist philosophers such as Alasdair MacIntyre. Both hold that the concept is useless and even harmful. Pinker’s main criticism is that since the term has so many meanings, it is rendered muddy and inapplicable. This paper will first show earlier responses to Pinker and then weave a new response by demonstrating that, although the term is really polysemic, it has a central meaning which has been tried and found indispensable by the central Western philosophical and juridical tradition for more than two millennia. It will be proved, thus, that the claim about its uselessness lacks ground.
Downloads
References
Aquinas, T. (2000). Super Sent. Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra, available here: www.corpusthomisticum.org.
Aquinas, T. (2000). Summa theologiae. Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra, available here: www.corpusthomisticum.org.
Aquinas, T. (2000). De potentia. Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra, available here: www.corpusthomisticum.org.
Aquinas, T. (2000). De unione Verbi. Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra, available here: www.corpusthomisticum.org.
Aquinas, T. (2000). Contra errores Graecorum. Pamplona: Universidad de Navarra, available here: www.corpusthomisticum.org.
Aquinas, T. (1991). Commentary on Romans, available here: https://aquinas.cc/la/en/~Rom66.
Aristotle (1962). Ethica Nicomachea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aristotle (1895). Metaphysica. Leipzig: Teubner Verlag.
Aristotle (1894). Politica. Leipzig: Teubner Verlag.
Bello, A. (1855). Código Civil de Chile, available here: https://www.bcn.cl/leychile/navegar?idNorma=172986&idVersion=Diferido.
Blackstone, W. (1766). Commentaries on the Laws of England. Dublin: John Exshaw, Henry Saunders, Samuel Watson and James Williams.
Casanova, C. A. (2013). «¿Ha superado la noción de persona que postula la fenomenología realista la noción clásica, boeciana, de persona?», Synesis, 5/2, pp. 12-26, available here: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6356611.
Casanova, C. A. (2022). «La noción clásica de persona frente a la crítica empirista-utilitarista», en Derechos humanos: perspectivas de juristas jusnaturalistas, Agustín Herrera Fragoso (ed.), México: Tirant Lo Blanch, vol. 1, pp. 281-309.
Cicero, M. T. (2014). On the Republic, [and] On the Laws. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Davis, F. D. (2008). «Human Dignity and Respect for Persons», in Human Dignity and Bioethics. Washington DC: President’s Council on Bioethics, pp. 19-34.
De Koninck, C. (2009). The Primacy of the Common Good Against the Personalists, in The Writings of Charles de Koninck, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, vol. 2, pp. 64-108.
De Koninck, C. (1952). «El bien común y la primacía», Cuadernos Hispanoamericanos, 28 (abril 1952), pp. 21-31.
Feser, E. (2021). «Alasdair MacIntyre on human dignity: Summary, analysis, and comments», Catholic World Report (26 noviembre 2021), available here: https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2021/11/26/alasdair-macintyre-on-human-dignity-summary-analysis-and-comments/.
Finnis, J. (2021). «Abortion Is Unconstitutional», First Things (abril 2021), available here: https://www.firstthings.com/article/2021/04/abortion-is-unconstitutional.
Gaius (1845). Institutiones. Madrid: Imprenta de la Sociedad Literaria y Tipográfica.
Gimpel, J. (1977). The Medieval Machine: The Industrial Revolution of the Middle Ages. New York: Penguin Books.
Greek New Testament (1968). Aland, K.; Black, M.; Martini, C.; Metzger, B.; Wirgren, A. (eds.). Stuttgart: United Bible Societies.
Guarda, G. La Edad Media de Chile. Santiago: Ediciones UC.
Hippocrates (1984). Oath, in Hippocrates’ Works, vol. 1, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, pp. 291-301.
Hippocrates (1984). Precept VI, in Hippocrates’ Works, vol. 1, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press, p. 319.
Kass, L. «Defending Human Dignity», in Human Dignity and Bioethics, pp. 297-331.
Lee, P. & George, R. «The Nature and Basis of Human Dignity», in Human Dignity and Bioethics, pp. 409-433.
Locke, J. (1980). Second Treatise on Government, in Two Treatises of Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 285-446.
Locke, J. (1669). Fundamental Constitutions of Carolina, The Avalon Project, Yale Law School, available here: http://avalon.law.yale.edu/17th_century/nc05.asp.
Long, S. (2013). «Fundamental Errors of the New Natural Law Theory», The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly, spring 2013, pp. 105-131.
MacIntyre, A. (2021). Lecture at Notre Dame, Conference Human Dignity in a Secular World, organized by the Nicola Center for Ethics and Culture (12 noviembre), available here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=V727AcOoogQ.
McCrudden, C. (2022). «Alasdair MacIntyre’s Critique of Human Dignity: A Response», Law and Justice: The Christian Law Review, 189, pp. 110-125.
Meilaender, G. «Human Dignity: The Council’s Vision», in Human Dignity and Bioethics, pp. 252-277.
Pellegrino, E. «The Lived Experience of Human Dignity», in Human Dignity and Bioethics, pp. 513-537.
Pinker, S. (2008). «The Stupidity of Dignity», The New Republic, 28 mayo 2008, pp. 28-31.
Plato (1978). Republic, in Platonis Opera, vol. 4, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 327-621.
Plato (1907). Laws, in Platonis Opera, vol. 5, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 624-969.
Quintilian (1996). Institutions. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.
Rasmussen, J. & Bailey, A. (2020). «How Valuable Could a Person Be?», Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 103/2, pp. 264-277.
Savigny, F. C. (1979). Jural Relations or The Roman Law of Persons as Subjects of Human Relations. Westport, Connecticut: Hyperion Press.
Schulman, A. «Bioethics and the Question of Human Dignity», in Human Dignity and Bioethics, pp. 3-17.
Singer, P. (2011). Practical Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Singer, P. (1995). «Abortion», in The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 2-3.
Stith, R. (2011). «Her Choice, Her Problem: How Having a Choice Can Diminish Family Solidarity», International Journal of the Jurisprudence of the Family, 2, available here: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3250772.
Viehweg, T. (2007). Tópica y jurisprudencia. Pamplona: Civitas-Thomson.
Vinogradoff, P. (1909). Roman Law in Medieval Europe. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Vlastos, G. (1941). «Slavery in Plato’s Thought», in The Philosophical Review 50/3, pp. 289-304.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pensamiento. Revista de Investigación e Información Filosófica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The publishing Universidad Pontificia Comillas retain the copyright of articles published in Pensamiento. Reuse of content is allowed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivates 3.0 Unported. Authors are encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages, repositories, etc.) respecting the conditions of this license and quoting appropriately the original source.
