Psychological processes in the dynamics of reconciliation
Keywords:
Psychology of forgiveness, attributional processes, repentanceAbstract
The aim of this paper is to define the psychological concepts of forgiveness and reconciliation and review the main differences between them, moving later to review the psychological aspects involved in reconciliation. To do this, the psychological processes of reconciliation proposed in different contexts (identity conflicts, couples in trouble, conflicts in the workplace, and divorced couples) are reviewed and the common factors are analyzed. Cognitive and behavioral processes are identified as common to all interventions, remaining the question about the role of emotional processes in reconciliation.
Downloads
References
ALLAN, A., ALLAN, M.M., KAMINER, D. Y STEIN, D.J., Exploration of the association between apology and forgiveness amongst victims of human rights violations: Behavioral Sciences and the Law 24 (2006) 87-102.
ANDREWS, M., Forgiveness in context: Journal of Moral Education, 29 (2000) 75-86.
AUERBACH, Y., Forgiveness and Reconciliation: The religious dimension: Terrorism and Political Violence 17 (2005) 469-485
AUERBACH, Y., The Reconciliation Pyramid– A Narrative-Based Framework for Analyzing Identity Conflicts: Political Psychology, 30 (2009) 291-318.
BERECZ, J.M., All That Glitters Is Not Gold: Bad Forgiveness in Counseling and Preaching: Pastoral Psychology 49 (2001) 253-275.
BERSNTEIN, A.C., Re-visioning, restructuring and reconciliation: clinical practice with complex postdivorce families: Family Process 46 (2007) 67-78.
ENRIGHT, R.D. - NORTH, J., Exploring forgiveness. Madison 1998.
ENRIGHT, R.D. - COYLE., C.T. Researching the process model of forgiveness within psychological interventions, en E.L. Worthington Jr. (ed.), Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological research and theological perspectives, Philadelphia 1998, 139-161.
ENRIGHT, R.D. - The Human Development Study Group, Piaget on the moral development of forgiveness: identity or reciprocity?: Human Development, 37 (1994) 63-80.
FREEDMAN, S., Forgiveness & reconciliation: The importance of understanding how they differ: Counseling and Values, 42 (1998) 200-216.
FRISE, N.R. Y MCMINN, M.R., Forgiveness and reconciliation: the differing perspectives of psychologists and Christian theologians: Journal of Psychology and Theology 38 (2010) 83-90.
GORDON, K., BURTON, S. Y PORTER, L., Predicting the intentions of women in domestic violence shelters to return to partners: Does forgiveness play a role?: Journal of Family Psychology 18 (2004) 331-338.
HARDGRAVE, T.D., Families and forgiveness: healing wounds in the intergenerational family, New York 1994.
KEARNS, J.N. - FINCHAM, F.D., A prototype analysis of forgiveness: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30 (2004) 838-855.
LAMB, S., Introduction: Reasons to be caution about the use of forgiveness in psychotherapy, en S. Lamb - J. G. Murphy (eds.), Before forgiving: Cautionary views of forgiveness in psychotherapy, New York 2002, 3-14.
LAMB, S., Forgiveness Therapy: The Context and Conflict: Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 25 (2005) 61-80.
LAWLER-ROW, K., SCOTT, C.A., RAINES, R.L., EDLIS-MATITYAHOU, M. Y MOORE, E.W., The Varieties of Forgiveness Experience: Working toward a Comprehensive Definition of Forgiveness: Journal of Religion and Health 46 (2007) 233-248
LUCHIES, L.B., FINKEL, E.J., MCNULTY, J.K. y KUMASHIRO, M., The doormat effect: When forgiving erodes self-respect and self-concept clarity: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 98 (2010) 734-749.
MACASKILL, A., Defining Forgiveness: Christian Clergy and General Population Perspectives: Journal of Personality 73 (2005) 1237-1265.
MCCULLOUGH, M.E., Forgiveness as human strength: theory, measurement, and links to well-being: Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19 (2000) 43-55.
MCNULTY, J.K., Forgiveness in marriage: Putting the benefits into context: Journal of Family Psychology 22 (2008) 171-175.
MCNULTY, J.K., Forgiveness increases the likelihood of subsequent partner transgressions in marriage: Journal of Family Psychology 24 (2010) 787-790.
MCNULTY, J.K., The dark side of forgiveness: The tendency to forgive predicts continued psychological and physical aggression in marriage: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37 (2011) 770-783.
POITRAS, J., Mediation: depolarizing responsibilities to facilitate reconciliation: International Journal of Conflict Management 21 (2009) 4-19.
SELLS, J.N. - Hargrave, T.D., Forgiveness: a review of the theoretical and empirical literature: Journal of Family Therapy 20 (1998) 21-36.
VEENSTRA, G., Psychological concepts of forgiveness: Journal of Psychology and Christianity 11 (1992) 160-169.
WORTHINGTON, E.L., Jr, Unforgiveness, forgiveness, and reconciliation in societies, en R.G. Helmick y R.L. Petersen (Eds.), Forgiveness and reconciliation: Religion, public policy, and conflict transformation, Philadelphia 2001, 161-182.
WORTHINGTON, E.L., The Pyramid Model of Forgiveness: some interdisciplinary speculations about unforgiveness and the promotion of forgiveness, en E.L. Worthington, Jr. (ed.), Dimensions of Forgiveness: psychological research and theological perspectives, Philadelphia 1998, 107-137.
E.L. WORTHINGTON - D.T. DRINKARD, Promoting reconciliation through psychoeducational and therapeutic interventions: Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 26 (2000) 93-101.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors in Estudios Eclesiásticos retain the intellectual property rights over their works and grant the journal their distribution and public communication rights, consenting to their publication under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivates 4.0 Internacional. Authors are encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages, repositories, etc.) respecting the conditions of this license and quoting appropriately the original source.