The Socratic Ignorance as Epistemic Virtue

Authors

  • Marcelo D. Boeri Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14422/pen.v77.i293.y2021.006

Keywords:

Socrates, Plato, ignorance, knowledge, epistemic virtue

Abstract

In this article I argue that an especial kind of ignorance, of «Socratic» overtones, is central to the acquisition of knowledge given the epistemic structure of society. Socrates noted the relevance of a certain type of ignorance in the acquisition of knowledge and was aware of the epistemic division of labor in society. Firstly, I explain how I understand the so-called «Socratic Ignorance» (SI) as different from what I will call «stubborn ignorance» (SI). Then, I discuss some intellectual vices (such as epistemic arrogance) and the role that intellectual virtues (epistemic humility and autonomy) can have regarding stubborn ignorance as a corrective that has both epistemic and moral implications. This kind of approach can be very helpful for exploiting some assumptions of contemporary social epistemology, according to which the acquisition of knowledge is made from others and with others.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brickhouse, T. C. y Smith, N. D. (2000). The Philosophy of Socrates. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.

Burnet, J. (1976). Platonis Opera (Recognovit brevique admnotatione critica instruxit Ioannes Burnet), Tomvs I-IV. Oxford: Oxford Classical Texts (reprinted).

Coady, C. A. (2012). What to Believe Now: applying epistemology to contemporary issues. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Davidson, D. (2005). «Dialectic and Dialogue», en: Davidson, D., Truth, Language, and History. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 251-259 https://doi.org/10.1093/019823757X.003.0017

Davidson, D. (2001). «First Person Authority», en: Davidson, D., Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198237537.003.0001

Dorion, L.-A. (2011). Que sais-je? Socrate. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. https://doi.org/10.3917/puf.dorio.2011.01

Gadamer, H.-G. (1999). Die Idee des Guten zwischen Plato und Aristoteles, en: Gadamer, H.-G., Gesammelte Werke 7. Griechische Philosophie III. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 128-227.

Giannantoni, G. (2005). Dialogo socratico e nascita della dialettica nella filosofía di Plato¬ne (Edizione postuma a cura di Bruno Centrone). Napoli: Bibliopolis.

Gill, C. (2004). «Afterword: Dialectic and the Dialogue Form in Late Plato», en: Gill, C. y McCabe, M. M. (eds.), Form and Argument in Late Plato. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 283-311.

Gill, C. (2007). «Form and outcome of arguments in Plato's Gorgias», en: Erler, M. y Brisson, L. (eds.) Gorgias-Menon. Selected papers from the Seventh Symposium Platonicum. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag, 62-65.

Goldman, A. (2001). «Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?», en: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research vol. 63, N°1, 85-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2001.tb00093.x

Goldman, A. y Olsson, E. J., «Reliabilism and the Value of Knowledge», en: Haddock, A., Millar, A. y Pritchard, D. (eds.) Epistemic Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 19-41. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231188.003.0002

Kahn, C. (1996). Plato and the Socratic Dialogue. The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511585579

Kruger, J. y Dunning, D. (2009). «Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessment» en: Psychology, 1, 30-46

Le Morvan, P. y Peels, R. (2016). «The Nature of Ignorance: Two Views», en: Peels, R. y Blaauw, M. (eds.), The Epistemic Dimensions of Ignorance, Cambridge: UCambridge University Press, 12-3. https://doi.org/10.1017/9780511820076.002

MacPartland, K., «Socratic Ignorance and Types of Knowledge», en: Bussanich, J. y Smith, N. D. (eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Socrates. London-New Delhi-New York-Sydney: Bloomsbury, 2013, 94-135.

Mercier, H. y Sperberg, D. (2017). The Enigma of Reason. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Natali, C. (2007).«Due dissertazioni scritte in fretta. Gadamer e Davidson sul Filebo di Platone»,en: Méthexis XX, 113-143. https://doi.org/10.1163/24680974-90000521

Peels, R. y Blaauw, M. (2016). «Introduction», en: Peels, R., Blaauw, M. (eds.) The Epistemic Dimensions of Ignorance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1017/9780511820076.001

Pritchard, D. (2016). «Ignorance and Epistemic Value», en: Peels, R. y Blaauw, M. (eds.) The Epistemic Dimensions of Ignorance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 132-143. https://doi.org/10.1017/9780511820076.008

Renaud, F. (2008). «Les Mémorables de Xénophon et le Gorgias de Platon : étude comparative», en: Narcy, M. y Tordesillas, A. (eds.) Xénophon et Socrates. Paris: Vrin, 161- 180.

Sloman, S., Fernbach, P. (2017). The Knowledge Illusion: Why we never think alone. London: Macmillan.

Taylor, C. C. W. (2008). «Socrates», en: Taylor, C. C. W., Pleasure, Mind, and Soul. Selected Papers in Ancient Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Vallejo Campos, A. (2017). «Sócrates» en: Vallejo Campos, A. y Vigo A. G., Filósofos griegos: de los sofistas a Aristóteles. Pamplona: Eunsa, 93-104.

Vigo, A. G. (2018). Platón, Apología de Sócrates. Buenos Aires: Ed. Colihue.

Waterfield, R. (2013). «The Quest for the Historical Socrates», en: Bussanich, J. y Smith, N. D. (eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Socrates. London-New Delhi-New York- Sydney: Bloomsbury, 1-19.

Zagzebski, L. (2012). Epistemic Authority: A Theory of Trust, Authority, and Autonomy in Belief. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199936472.001.0001

Zimmerman, M. J. (2008). Living with Uncertainty. The Moral Significance of Ignorance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511481505

Published

2021-07-20

How to Cite

Boeri, M. D. . (2021). The Socratic Ignorance as Epistemic Virtue. Pensamiento. Revista De Investigación E Información Filosófica, 77(293), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.14422/pen.v77.i293.y2021.006