“Left Behindness” – Is Mobility an Answer?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14422/mig.y2026.i68

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barcus, H., & Werner, C. (2017). Choosing to stay: (Im)Mobility decisions amongst Mongolia’s ethnic Kazakhs. Globalizations, 14(1), 32-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2016.1161038

Benson, M., & O’Reilly, K. (2016). From lifestyle migration to lifestyle in migration: Categories, concepts and ways of thinking. Migration Studies, 4(1), 20-37. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnv015

Bitschnau, M., & D’Amato, G. (2023). Continuum, process, and dyad: three readings of the migration-mobility nexus. Migration Studies, 11(4), 631-649. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnad023

Carling, J. (2002). Migration in the age of involuntary immobility: Theoretical reflections and Cape Verdean experiences. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 28(1), 5-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830120103912

Carling, J., & Pettersen, S. V. (2014). Return migration intentions in the integration-transnationalism matrix. International Migration, 52(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12161

Carling, J., & Schewel, K. (2018). Revisiting aspiration and ability in international migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(6), 945-963. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1384146

Cassarino, J. P. (2004). Theorising return migration: The conceptual approach to return migrants revisited. International Journal on Multicultural Societies, 6(2), 253 -279.

Cerase, F. P. (1974). Expectations and reality: A case study of return migration from the United States to Southern Italy. International Migration Review, 8(2), 245-262. https://doi.org/10.2307/3002783

Charmillot, E., & Dahinden, J. (2021). Mobilities, locality and placemaking: understanding categories of (non-)membership in a peripheral valley. Mobilities, 17(3), 366-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2021.1971054

Cohen, S., Duncan, T., & Thulemark, M. (2013). Introducing lifestyle mobilities. In T. Duncan, S. Cohen & M. Thulemark (eds.), Lifestyle mobilities: Intersections of travel, leisure and migration (pp. 1-20). Routledge.

Cohen, S., Duncan, T., & Thulemark, M. (2015). Lifestyle mobilities: The crossroads of travel, leisure and migration. Mobilities, 10(1), 155-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2013.826481

Cresswell, T. (2006). On the move: Mobility in the modern western world. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203446713

Curci, N., McGarrigle, J., & Esteves, A. (2026). Frontline practices and ambivalent roles in the reception and integration of immigrants in a rural area in Portugal. Migraciones, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.14422/mig.23801.027

De Haas, H. (2010). Migration and development: A theoretical perspective. International Migration Review, 44(1), 227-264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2009.00804.x

De Haas, H. De (2007). Turning the Tide? Why Development Will Not Stop Migration. Development and Change, 38(5), 819-841. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00435.x

De Ruyter, A., Martin, R., & Tyler, P. (2021). Geographies of discontent: sources, manifestations and consequences. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 14(3), 381-393. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsab025

Deliu, A., & Manoilă, M. (2026). Place attachment, identities and mobility experiences. Evidence from a left behind area in Romania. Migraciones, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.14422/mig.23897.024

Deliu, A., Manoilă, M., Șerban, M., & McGarrigle, J. (2025). In-between labels: researching left behind areas in multiple national contexts. Rural Areas and Development, 19, 31-36. https://doi.org/10.61517/RAD/2025/19.0300

Desille, A., & Mcgarrigle, J. (2026). Immigrant integration governance and local development models in “left-behind” places. Migraciones, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.14422/mig.23877.031

Dijkstra, L., Poelman, H., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2020). The geography of EU discontent. Regional Studies, 54(6), 737-753. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1654603

Domínguez-Mujica, J., Parreño-Castellano, J. M., Moreno-Medina, C. J., & Rodríguez-Rodríguez, M. Á. (2026). Islandness, Human Mobility and Left-Behindness: Insights from El Hierro, Canary Islands, Spain. Migraciones, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.14422/mig.23791.015

Erickson, L. D., Sanders, S. R., & Cope, M. R. (2018). Lifetime stayers in urban, rural, and highly rural communities in Montana. Population, Space and Place, 24(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2133

Faist, T. (2000). The Volume and Dynamics of International Migration and Transnational Social Spaces. Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198293910.001.0001

Gansauer, G. (2025). “Left behind” places versus peripheralized spaces: Integrating absolute, relative, and relational understandings of spatial inequality in the 21st century. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 57(8), 1223-1233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X251384768

Gansauer, G., & Fiorentino, S. (2026). Beyond agglomeration: putting the “place” back in place-based policy for “left behind” regions. Regional Studies, 60(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2026.2718331

Gavrila, M., Rumi, C., & Staniscia, B. (2026). The value of diversity: Women’s Strategic Role in the Renaissance of Left-behind Areas in Italy. Migraciones, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.14422/mig.23994.026

Glick Schiller, N., & Salazar, N. (2013). Regimes of mobility across the globe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(2), 183-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2013.723253

Glorius, B., Kordel, S., Weidinger, T., Bürer, M., Schneider, H., & Spenger, D. (2020). Is Social Contact With the Resident Population a Prerequisite of Well-Being and Place Attachment? The Case of Refugees in Rural Regions of Germany. Frontiers in Sociology, 5, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.578495

Goodwin-Hawkins, B., & Dafydd Jones, R. (2021). Rethinking lifestyle and middle-class migration in “left behind” regions. Population, Space, and Place, 28(8), 2495. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2495

Halfacree, K. (2008). To revitalise counterurbanisation research? Recognising an international and fuller picture. Population, Space and Place, 14(6), 479-495. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.501

Hammar, T., & Tamas, K. (1997). Why do people go or stay? In K. Tamas & T. Faist (eds.), International Migration, Immobility and Development. Multidisciplinary (pp. 1-19). Berg. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003136125-1

King, R., & Skeldon, R. (2010). “Mind the Gap!” Integrating Approaches to Internal and International Migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(10), 1619-1646. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2010.489380

MacKinnon, D., Kempton, L., O’brien, P., Ormerod, E., Pike, A., & Tomaney, J. (2022). Reframing urban and regional “development” for “left behind” places. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 15(1), 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsab034

Manoilă, M., & Deliu, A. (2026). Beauty Is in the eye of the beholder: an account of place attractivity in a Romanian left-behind area. Migraciones, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.14422/mig.24199.028

Martin, R., Martinelli, F., & Clifton, J. (2022). Rethinking spatial policy in an era of multiple crises. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 15(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsab037

McGarrigle, J., Desille, A., Safina, A., Staniscia, B., Mendoza, C., Göler, D., Sacha, E., Domínguez-Mujica, J., Parreño-Castellano, J. M., Vale, M., Berzins, M., Rodríguez Rodríguez, M. Á., & Krišjāne, Z. (2024). Re-Place: Innovative concepts. Re-Place Project Deliverable. https://replace-horizon.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Re-Place_Innovativeconcepts_Webversion.pdf

Miletić, M., Sacha, E., & Göler, D. (2026). Between integration and work in three shifts: Exploring integration dynamics in an East German rural town. Migraciones, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.14422/mig.23822.022

Montanari, A., & Staniscia, B. (2016). Human mobility: An issue of multidisciplinary research. In J. Domínguez Mujica (ed.), Global Change and Human Mobility (pp. 1-23). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0050-8_1

Moretti, E. (2012). The New geography of jobs. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Newland, K. (2007). A New Surge of Interest in Migration and Development. Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/journal/feature/new-surge-interest-migration-and-development

Newland, K., Rannveig Aguinas, D., & Terrazas, A. (2008). Learning by doing: experiences of circular migration. Insight: Migration Policy Institute, (September), 1-28.

Piccoli, L., Gianni, M., Ruedin, D., Achermann, C., Dahinden, J., Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, P., Nedelcu, M., & Zittoun, T. (2024). What is the nexus between migration and mobility? A framework to understand the interplay between different ideal types of human movement. Sociology, 58(5), 1019-1037. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385241228836

Pike, A., Béal, V., Cauchi-Duval, N., Franklin, R., Kinossian, N., Lang, T., Leibert, T., MacKinnon, D., Rousseau, M., Royer, J., Servillo, L., Tomaney, J., & Velthuis, S. (2024). “Left behind places”: A geographical etymology. Regional Studies, 58(6), 1167-1179. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2167972

Rodríguez Rodríguez, M. Á., Mendoza, C., & Domínguez-Mujica, J. (2026). Immigrant entrepreneurship and rural tourism in a left-behind region, Sayago (Zamora, Spain). Migraciones, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.14422/mig.23857.014

Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018). The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 189-209. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx024

Rye, J. F., & Scott, S. (2018). International Labour Migration and Food Production in Rural Europe: A Review of the Evidence. Sociologia Ruralis, 58(4), 928-952. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12208

Sandu, D. (2024a). Regional Human Development Index for Europe, 2019 (RHDI_EU) [EUROPE] [Computer file]. Bucharest, Romania: Research Institute for the Quality of Life - Romanian Academy of Science [producer]. Re-Place Project, Horizon Europe Grant Agreement No. 101094087.

Sandu, D. (2024b). Local Human Development Index for Romania, 2021-2022 (LHDI_RO) [ROMANIA] [Computer file]. Bucharest, Romania: Research Institute for the Quality of Life - Romanian Academy of Science [producer]. Re-Place Project, Horizon Europe Grant Agreement No. 101094087.

Schewel, K. (2020). Understanding immobility: Moving beyond the mobility bias in migration studies. International migration review, 54(2), 328-355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918319831952

Staniscia, B., Safina, A., & Fiorentino, G. (2026). Social Innovation and human mobility in left behind areas: strategies to cope with peripherality in Southern Cilento and Viù Valley (Italy). Migraciones, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.14422/mig.23832.023

Stockdale, A. (2016). Contemporary and “Messy” Rural In-migration Processes: Comparing Counterurban and Lateral Rural Migration. Population, Space and Place, 22(6), 599-616. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1947

Tomaney, J., Blackman, M., Natarajan, L., Panayotopoulos-Tsiros, D., Sutcliffe-Braithwaite, F., & Taylor, M. (2024). Social infrastructure and “left-behind places”. Regional Studies, 58(6), 1237-1250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2224828

Triandafyllidou, A. (2023). Circular migration between the EU and its neighbours. A Comparative analysis [Report]. Toronto Metropolitan University. https://doi.org/10.32920/24290599.v1

Wyss, A. (2019). Stuck in mobility? Interrupted journeys of migrants with precarious legal status in Europe. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 17(1), 77-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2018.1514091

Zelinsky, W. (1971). The hypothesis of the mobility transition. Geographical Review, 61(2), 219-249. https://doi.org/10.2307/213996

Published

2026-09-29

How to Cite

Șerban, M., & McGarrigle, J. (2026). “Left Behindness” – Is Mobility an Answer?. Migraciones. Publicación Del Instituto Universitario De Estudios Sobre Migraciones, 68, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.14422/mig.y2026.i68