“Left Behindness” – Is Mobility an Answer?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14422/mig.y2026.i68Downloads
References
Barcus, H., & Werner, C. (2017). Choosing to stay: (Im)Mobility decisions amongst Mongolia’s ethnic Kazakhs. Globalizations, 14(1), 32-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2016.1161038
Benson, M., & O’Reilly, K. (2016). From lifestyle migration to lifestyle in migration: Categories, concepts and ways of thinking. Migration Studies, 4(1), 20-37. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnv015
Bitschnau, M., & D’Amato, G. (2023). Continuum, process, and dyad: three readings of the migration-mobility nexus. Migration Studies, 11(4), 631-649. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnad023
Carling, J. (2002). Migration in the age of involuntary immobility: Theoretical reflections and Cape Verdean experiences. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 28(1), 5-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691830120103912
Carling, J., & Pettersen, S. V. (2014). Return migration intentions in the integration-transnationalism matrix. International Migration, 52(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12161
Carling, J., & Schewel, K. (2018). Revisiting aspiration and ability in international migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(6), 945-963. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1384146
Cassarino, J. P. (2004). Theorising return migration: The conceptual approach to return migrants revisited. International Journal on Multicultural Societies, 6(2), 253 -279.
Cerase, F. P. (1974). Expectations and reality: A case study of return migration from the United States to Southern Italy. International Migration Review, 8(2), 245-262. https://doi.org/10.2307/3002783
Charmillot, E., & Dahinden, J. (2021). Mobilities, locality and placemaking: understanding categories of (non-)membership in a peripheral valley. Mobilities, 17(3), 366-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2021.1971054
Cohen, S., Duncan, T., & Thulemark, M. (2013). Introducing lifestyle mobilities. In T. Duncan, S. Cohen & M. Thulemark (eds.), Lifestyle mobilities: Intersections of travel, leisure and migration (pp. 1-20). Routledge.
Cohen, S., Duncan, T., & Thulemark, M. (2015). Lifestyle mobilities: The crossroads of travel, leisure and migration. Mobilities, 10(1), 155-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2013.826481
Cresswell, T. (2006). On the move: Mobility in the modern western world. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203446713
Curci, N., McGarrigle, J., & Esteves, A. (2026). Frontline practices and ambivalent roles in the reception and integration of immigrants in a rural area in Portugal. Migraciones, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.14422/mig.23801.027
De Haas, H. (2010). Migration and development: A theoretical perspective. International Migration Review, 44(1), 227-264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2009.00804.x
De Haas, H. De (2007). Turning the Tide? Why Development Will Not Stop Migration. Development and Change, 38(5), 819-841. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00435.x
De Ruyter, A., Martin, R., & Tyler, P. (2021). Geographies of discontent: sources, manifestations and consequences. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 14(3), 381-393. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsab025
Deliu, A., & Manoilă, M. (2026). Place attachment, identities and mobility experiences. Evidence from a left behind area in Romania. Migraciones, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.14422/mig.23897.024
Deliu, A., Manoilă, M., Șerban, M., & McGarrigle, J. (2025). In-between labels: researching left behind areas in multiple national contexts. Rural Areas and Development, 19, 31-36. https://doi.org/10.61517/RAD/2025/19.0300
Desille, A., & Mcgarrigle, J. (2026). Immigrant integration governance and local development models in “left-behind” places. Migraciones, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.14422/mig.23877.031
Dijkstra, L., Poelman, H., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2020). The geography of EU discontent. Regional Studies, 54(6), 737-753. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2019.1654603
Domínguez-Mujica, J., Parreño-Castellano, J. M., Moreno-Medina, C. J., & Rodríguez-Rodríguez, M. Á. (2026). Islandness, Human Mobility and Left-Behindness: Insights from El Hierro, Canary Islands, Spain. Migraciones, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.14422/mig.23791.015
Erickson, L. D., Sanders, S. R., & Cope, M. R. (2018). Lifetime stayers in urban, rural, and highly rural communities in Montana. Population, Space and Place, 24(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2133
Faist, T. (2000). The Volume and Dynamics of International Migration and Transnational Social Spaces. Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198293910.001.0001
Gansauer, G. (2025). “Left behind” places versus peripheralized spaces: Integrating absolute, relative, and relational understandings of spatial inequality in the 21st century. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 57(8), 1223-1233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X251384768
Gansauer, G., & Fiorentino, S. (2026). Beyond agglomeration: putting the “place” back in place-based policy for “left behind” regions. Regional Studies, 60(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2026.2718331
Gavrila, M., Rumi, C., & Staniscia, B. (2026). The value of diversity: Women’s Strategic Role in the Renaissance of Left-behind Areas in Italy. Migraciones, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.14422/mig.23994.026
Glick Schiller, N., & Salazar, N. (2013). Regimes of mobility across the globe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(2), 183-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2013.723253
Glorius, B., Kordel, S., Weidinger, T., Bürer, M., Schneider, H., & Spenger, D. (2020). Is Social Contact With the Resident Population a Prerequisite of Well-Being and Place Attachment? The Case of Refugees in Rural Regions of Germany. Frontiers in Sociology, 5, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.578495
Goodwin-Hawkins, B., & Dafydd Jones, R. (2021). Rethinking lifestyle and middle-class migration in “left behind” regions. Population, Space, and Place, 28(8), 2495. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2495
Halfacree, K. (2008). To revitalise counterurbanisation research? Recognising an international and fuller picture. Population, Space and Place, 14(6), 479-495. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.501
Hammar, T., & Tamas, K. (1997). Why do people go or stay? In K. Tamas & T. Faist (eds.), International Migration, Immobility and Development. Multidisciplinary (pp. 1-19). Berg. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003136125-1
King, R., & Skeldon, R. (2010). “Mind the Gap!” Integrating Approaches to Internal and International Migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(10), 1619-1646. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2010.489380
MacKinnon, D., Kempton, L., O’brien, P., Ormerod, E., Pike, A., & Tomaney, J. (2022). Reframing urban and regional “development” for “left behind” places. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 15(1), 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsab034
Manoilă, M., & Deliu, A. (2026). Beauty Is in the eye of the beholder: an account of place attractivity in a Romanian left-behind area. Migraciones, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.14422/mig.24199.028
Martin, R., Martinelli, F., & Clifton, J. (2022). Rethinking spatial policy in an era of multiple crises. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 15(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsab037
McGarrigle, J., Desille, A., Safina, A., Staniscia, B., Mendoza, C., Göler, D., Sacha, E., Domínguez-Mujica, J., Parreño-Castellano, J. M., Vale, M., Berzins, M., Rodríguez Rodríguez, M. Á., & Krišjāne, Z. (2024). Re-Place: Innovative concepts. Re-Place Project Deliverable. https://replace-horizon.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Re-Place_Innovativeconcepts_Webversion.pdf
Miletić, M., Sacha, E., & Göler, D. (2026). Between integration and work in three shifts: Exploring integration dynamics in an East German rural town. Migraciones, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.14422/mig.23822.022
Montanari, A., & Staniscia, B. (2016). Human mobility: An issue of multidisciplinary research. In J. Domínguez Mujica (ed.), Global Change and Human Mobility (pp. 1-23). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0050-8_1
Moretti, E. (2012). The New geography of jobs. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Newland, K. (2007). A New Surge of Interest in Migration and Development. Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/journal/feature/new-surge-interest-migration-and-development
Newland, K., Rannveig Aguinas, D., & Terrazas, A. (2008). Learning by doing: experiences of circular migration. Insight: Migration Policy Institute, (September), 1-28.
Piccoli, L., Gianni, M., Ruedin, D., Achermann, C., Dahinden, J., Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, P., Nedelcu, M., & Zittoun, T. (2024). What is the nexus between migration and mobility? A framework to understand the interplay between different ideal types of human movement. Sociology, 58(5), 1019-1037. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385241228836
Pike, A., Béal, V., Cauchi-Duval, N., Franklin, R., Kinossian, N., Lang, T., Leibert, T., MacKinnon, D., Rousseau, M., Royer, J., Servillo, L., Tomaney, J., & Velthuis, S. (2024). “Left behind places”: A geographical etymology. Regional Studies, 58(6), 1167-1179. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2167972
Rodríguez Rodríguez, M. Á., Mendoza, C., & Domínguez-Mujica, J. (2026). Immigrant entrepreneurship and rural tourism in a left-behind region, Sayago (Zamora, Spain). Migraciones, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.14422/mig.23857.014
Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018). The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 189-209. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx024
Rye, J. F., & Scott, S. (2018). International Labour Migration and Food Production in Rural Europe: A Review of the Evidence. Sociologia Ruralis, 58(4), 928-952. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12208
Sandu, D. (2024a). Regional Human Development Index for Europe, 2019 (RHDI_EU) [EUROPE] [Computer file]. Bucharest, Romania: Research Institute for the Quality of Life - Romanian Academy of Science [producer]. Re-Place Project, Horizon Europe Grant Agreement No. 101094087.
Sandu, D. (2024b). Local Human Development Index for Romania, 2021-2022 (LHDI_RO) [ROMANIA] [Computer file]. Bucharest, Romania: Research Institute for the Quality of Life - Romanian Academy of Science [producer]. Re-Place Project, Horizon Europe Grant Agreement No. 101094087.
Schewel, K. (2020). Understanding immobility: Moving beyond the mobility bias in migration studies. International migration review, 54(2), 328-355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918319831952
Staniscia, B., Safina, A., & Fiorentino, G. (2026). Social Innovation and human mobility in left behind areas: strategies to cope with peripherality in Southern Cilento and Viù Valley (Italy). Migraciones, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.14422/mig.23832.023
Stockdale, A. (2016). Contemporary and “Messy” Rural In-migration Processes: Comparing Counterurban and Lateral Rural Migration. Population, Space and Place, 22(6), 599-616. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1947
Tomaney, J., Blackman, M., Natarajan, L., Panayotopoulos-Tsiros, D., Sutcliffe-Braithwaite, F., & Taylor, M. (2024). Social infrastructure and “left-behind places”. Regional Studies, 58(6), 1237-1250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2224828
Triandafyllidou, A. (2023). Circular migration between the EU and its neighbours. A Comparative analysis [Report]. Toronto Metropolitan University. https://doi.org/10.32920/24290599.v1
Wyss, A. (2019). Stuck in mobility? Interrupted journeys of migrants with precarious legal status in Europe. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 17(1), 77-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2018.1514091
Zelinsky, W. (1971). The hypothesis of the mobility transition. Geographical Review, 61(2), 219-249. https://doi.org/10.2307/213996
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors of articles published in Migraciones retain the intellectual property rights over their works and grant the journal their distribution and public communication rights, consenting to their publication under a Creative Commons NonCommercial-NoDerivatives-Attribution 4.0 International License. Authors are encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (for example, on institutional or personal pages, repositories, etc.) respecting the conditions of this license and quoting appropriately the original source.



